ArticleHeart and vessels2022
Clinical value of the HATCH score for predicting adverse outcomes in patients with heart failure.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors predicting the recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation: A review.Heliyon · 2024Review
- The prognostic value of systemic vascular resistance in heart failure patients with permanent atrial fibrillation: a retrospective study.Heart and vessels · 2023Article
- Progression from paroxysmal to persistent atrial fibrillation in pacemaker patients with tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome: a multicenter study.Heart and vessels · 2023Article
- The Role of HATCH Score in the Prediction of Ischemic Cerebrovascular Events in Patients with Heart Failure and Atrial Fibrillation.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisArticle
- One Size Does Not Fit All: Echocardiography as a Decision-making Tool in Atrial Fibrillation Management - A Case Series.Journal of cardiovascular echographyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The HATCH score is employed as a risk assessment tool for atrial fibrillation (AF) development. However, the impact of the HATCH score on the long-term adverse outcomes in patients with acute heart failure (AHF) remains unknown. We investigated the clinical value of the HATCH score in patients with AHF. From a multicenter AHF registry, we retrospectively evaluated 1543 consecutive patients who required hospitalization owing to AHF (median age, 78 [69-85] years; 42.3% women) from January 2012 to December 2019. These patients were divided into five risk groups based on their HATCH score at admission (scores 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4-7). The correlation between the HATCH score and the composite outcome, including all-cause mortality and re-hospitalization due to HF, was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional-hazard analyses. The median HATCH score was 2 [1-3], and the median age was 78 years (69-85 years). During the follow-up period (median, 16.8 months), the composite endpoint occurred in 691 patients (44.8%), including 416 (27%) patients who died (with 65 [4.2%] in-hospitalization deaths) and 455 (29.5%) patients requiring re-hospitalizations due to HF. The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a significant increase in the composite endpoint with an increasing HATCH score (log-rank, p < 0.001). The multivariate Cox regression model revealed that the HATCH score was an independent predictor of the composite endpoint (hazard ratio [HR] 1.181; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.111-1.255; p < 0.001) with all-cause mortality (HR 1.153, 95% CI 1.065-1.249; p < 0.001) and re-hospitalizations due to HF (HR 1.21; 95% CI 1.124-1.303; p < 0.001) in patients with AHF, regardless of the presence or absence of AF, ejection fraction, and etiology. The HATCH score is an independent predictor of adverse outcomes in patients with AHF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35224666What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.