Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35224299›Full record

ReviewBioactive materials2022

Advancing dental implants: Bioactive and therapeutic modifications of zirconia.

Divya Chopra, Anjana Jayasree, Tianqi Guo, Karan Gulati, Sašo Ivanovski

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioactive materials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. The dental implant surface: a review of the past, present and future.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. New NaBMC chemistry · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Zirconia Dental Implants Surface Electric Stimulation Impact onInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Revolutionizing endodontics: Advancements in nickel-titanium instrument surfaces.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Divya ChopraThe University of Queensland, School of Dentistry, Herston QLD, 4006, Australia.
Anjana JayasreeThe University of Queensland, School of Dentistry, Herston QLD, 4006, Australia.
Tianqi GuoThe University of Queensland, School of Dentistry, Herston QLD, 4006, Australia.
Karan GulatiThe University of Queensland, School of Dentistry, Herston QLD, 4006, Australia.
Sašo IvanovskiThe University of Queensland, School of Dentistry, Herston QLD, 4006, Australia.
The University of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Zirconium-based implants have gained popularity in the dental implant field owing to their corrosion resistance and biocompatibility, attributed to the formation of a native zirconia (ZrO

Indexed as

BioactivityImplantsLocal therapyOsseointegrationSurface modificationZirconiaZirconium

Identifiers

PMID35224299
PMCPMC8843948
OpenAlexW3214099979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.