ArticleHealth science reports2022
Bridging troubled water - exploring improvement and patients' experiences using patient-reported outcome measures in physiotherapy: A mixed-method study.
Article in Health science reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsIncreased use of patient-reported outcomes in health care has been emphasized. Our aim was to use the Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) to examine improvement in neck pain patients' activity limitations during physiotherapy treatment, with the purpose to explore the patients' experiences of using PSFS. The study illuminates whether and how PSFS can be useful in clinical physiotherapy.
methodsSix patients participated. A mixed-method study design was applied, triangulating ontological perspectives of realism and phenomenology, quantitative and qualitative methods. Single Subject Experimental Design with PSFS as outcome measure examined changes over time and phenomenological interviews examined its meaningfulness for patients. Patients defined their personal activity limitations due to neck pain and scored difficulties several times, during the physiotherapy treatment period, using PSFS. We used visual analyses of the quantitative data and thematic analyses of the qualitative data. Integration and combination of the results from the two designs are presented in the discussion.
resultsIn the quantitative analyses, PSFS showed improvement in most activity limitations during treatment. The qualitative analyses revealed that using PSFS required the patient to engage in different bodily awareness processes and handle the dilemma of a possible double function of scoring chosen activities. The mixed findings revealed improved functionality and that the context and the interaction between patient and therapist have a significant influence on the assessment process.
conclusionsTo be able to improve the utilization of PSFS, communication between patients and physiotherapists is of vital importance. When using PSFS, physiotherapists should direct their attention to the importance of interaction as always present and vital in assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.