Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35224074›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in veterinary science2021

Role of Different Growth Enhancers as Alternative to In-feed Antibiotics in Poultry Industry.

Kazi Rafiq, Muhammad Tofazzal Hossain, Rokeya Ahmed, Md Mehedi Hasan, Rejaul Islam, Md Ismail Hossen, Sourendra Nath Shaha, Mohammad Rafiqul Islam

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
12.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Combination Effects ofBiology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Prevalence and risk factors of antimicrobial resistance inOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kazi RafiqDepartment of Pharmacology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh.
Muhammad Tofazzal HossainDepartment of Microbiology and Hygiene, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh.
Rokeya AhmedDepartment of Pharmacology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh.
Md Mehedi HasanDepartment of Pharmacology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh.
Rejaul IslamDepartment of Pharmacology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh.
Md Ismail HossenLivestock Division, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Sourendra Nath ShahaDepartment of Livestock Services, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Mohammad Rafiqul IslamLivestock Division, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Bangladesh Agricultural University · BDBangladesh Medical Research Council · BDBangladesh Livestock Research Institute · BD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The poultry industry has grown so fast alongside the irrational use of antibiotics to maximize profit and make the production cost-effective during the last few decades. The rising and indiscriminate use of antibiotics might result in the deposition of residues in poultry food products and in the development of resistance to these drugs by microorganisms. Therefore, many diseases are becoming difficult to treat both in humans and animals. In addition, the use of low-dose antibiotics as growth enhancer results in antibiotic residues in food products, which have detrimental effects on human health. On the other hand, many studies have shown that antibiotics administered to poultry and livestock are poorly absorbed through the gut and usually excreted without metabolism. These excreted antibiotics eventually accumulate in the environment and enter the human food chain, resulting in the bioaccumulation of drug residues in the human body. In this regard, to find out alternatives is of paramount importance for the production of safe meat and egg. Therefore, in recent years, much research attention was disarticulated toward the exploration for alternatives to antibiotic as in-feed growth enhancers after its ban by the EU. As a result, probiotics, prebiotics, phytobiotics, spirulina, symbiotic, and their combination are being used more frequently in poultry production. Feed additives therefore gained popularity in poultry production by having many advantages but without any residues in poultry products. In addition, numerous studies demonstrating that such biological supplements compete with antimicrobial resistance have been conducted. Therefore, the purpose of this review article was to highlight the advantages of using biological products instead of antibiotics as poultry in-feed growth enhancers to enhance the production performance, reduce intestinal pathogenic bacteria, and maintain gut health, potentiating the immune response, safety, and wholesomeness of meat and eggs as evidence of consumer protection, as well as to improve the safety of poultry products for human consumption.

Indexed as

growth promotersphytobioticspoultryprebioticsprobioticsspirulinasynbiotic

Identifiers

PMID35224074
PMCPMC8873819
OpenAlexW4211088442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.