Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35223916›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022

Predicting Severe Disease and Critical Illness on Initial Diagnosis of COVID-19: Simple Triage Tools.

Lutfi Ali S Kurban, Sharina AlDhaheri, Abdulbaset Elkkari, Ramzi Khashkhusha, Shaikha AlEissaee, Amna AlZaabi, Mohamed Ismail, Omran Bakoush

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05582382 (Validation of Prognostic Clinical Risk Scores in Predicting Outcomes for Patients Diagnosed With COVID-19 During Initial Triage Assessment), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05582382 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Validation of Prognostic Clinical Risk Scores in Predicting Outcomes for Patients Diagnosed With COVID-19 During Initial Triage Assessment

TypeobservationalSponsorDr Adnan AghaRan2023 to 2024Enrolled2,000ConditionsCOVID-19Armslogistic regression of known prognostic markers of severity of COVID19
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lutfi Ali S KurbanDepartment of Radiology, Tawam Hospital, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Sharina AlDhaheriDepartment of Internal Medicine, Tawam Hospital, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Abdulbaset ElkkariDepartment of Internal Medicine, Tawam Hospital, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Ramzi KhashkhushaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Tawam Hospital, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Shaikha AlEissaeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Tawam Hospital, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Amna AlZaabiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Tawam Hospital, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Mohamed IsmailDepartment of Internal Medicine, Tawam Hospital, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Omran BakoushDepartment of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleThis study was conducted to develop, validate, and compare prediction models for severe disease and critical illness among symptomatic patients with confirmed COVID-19.

methodsFor development cohort, 433 symptomatic patients diagnosed with COVID-19 between April 15th 2020 and June 30th, 2020 presented to Tawam Public Hospital, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates were included in this study. Our cohort included both severe and non-severe patients as all cases were admitted for purpose of isolation as per hospital policy. We examined 19 potential predictors of severe disease and critical illness that were recorded at the time of initial assessment. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to construct predictive models. Discrimination was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Calibration and goodness of fit of the models were assessed. A cohort of 213 patients assessed at another public hospital in the country during the same period was used to validate the models.

resultsOne hundred and eighty-six patients were classified as severe while the remaining 247 were categorized as non-severe. For prediction of progression to severe disease, the three independent predictive factors were age, serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and serum albumin (ALA model). For progression to critical illness, the four independent predictive factors were age, serum LDH, kidney function (eGFR), and serum albumin (ALKA model). The AUC for the ALA and ALKA models were 0.88 (95% CI, 0.86-0.89) and 0.85 (95% CI, 0.83-0.86), respectively. Calibration of the two models showed good fit and the validation cohort showed excellent discrimination, with an AUC of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.83-0.99) for the ALA model and 0.89 (95% CI, 0.80-0.99) for the ALKA model. A free web-based risk calculator was developed.

conclusionsThe ALA and ALKA predictive models were developed and validated based on simple, readily available clinical and laboratory tests assessed at presentation. These models may help frontline clinicians to triage patients for admission or discharge, as well as for early identification of patients at risk of developing critical illness.

Indexed as

COVID-19critical illnessdisease progressionprediction modelprognosis

Identifiers

PMID35223916
PMCPMC8866724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.