Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35223890›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022

Refining a Protocol for Faecal Microbiota Engraftment in Animal Models After Successful Antibiotic-Induced Gut Decontamination.

Nadia Amorim, Emily McGovern, Anita Raposo, Saroj Khatiwada, Sj Shen, Sabrina Koentgen, Georgina Hold, Jason Behary, Emad El-Omar, Amany Zekry

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The future of phage therapy in the USA.Trends in molecular medicine · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Human microbiota-associated animal models: a review.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nadia AmorimMicrobiome Research Centre, St. George and Sutherland Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Emily McGovernMicrobiome Research Centre, St. George and Sutherland Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Anita RaposoMicrobiome Research Centre, St. George and Sutherland Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Saroj KhatiwadaMicrobiome Research Centre, St. George and Sutherland Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Sj ShenMicrobiome Research Centre, St. George and Sutherland Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Sabrina KoentgenMicrobiome Research Centre, St. George and Sutherland Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Georgina HoldMicrobiome Research Centre, St. George and Sutherland Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Jason BeharyMicrobiome Research Centre, St. George and Sutherland Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Emad El-OmarMicrobiome Research Centre, St. George and Sutherland Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Amany ZekryMicrobiome Research Centre, St. George and Sutherland Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Sutherland Hospital · AUUNSW Sydney · AUSt George Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is mounting evidence for the therapeutic use of faecal microbiota transplant (FMT) in numerous chronic inflammatory diseases. Germ free mice are not always accessible for FMT research and hence alternative approaches using antibiotic depletion prior to FMT in animal studies are often used. Hence, there is a need for standardising gut microbiota depletion and FMT methodologies in animal studies. The aim of this study was to refine gut decontamination protocols prior to FMT engraftment and determine efficiency and stability of FMT engraftment over time.

methodsMale

resultsAntibiotic treatment for 7 days was most effective in gut decontamination, as evidenced by absence of bacteria observed in culture, and reduced bacterial concentration, as determined by FISH as well as qPCR. Continued antibiotic administration had no further efficacy on gut decontamination from days 7 to 21. Following gut decontamination, 3 weekly doses of FMT was sufficient for the successful engraftment of donor microbiota in animals. The recolonised animal gut microbiota was similar in composition to the donor sample, and significantly different from the Sham controls as assessed by 16S rRNA sequencing. Importantly, this similarity in composition to the donor sample persisted for 5 weeks following the final FMT dose.

conclusionsOur results showed that 7 days of broad-spectrum antibiotics in drinking water followed by 3 weekly doses of FMT provides a simple, reliable, and cost-effective methodology for FMT in animal research.

Indexed as

antibioticsfaecal microbiota transplantgut decontaminationgut engraftmentmicrobiome

Identifiers

PMID35223890
PMCPMC8864074
OpenAlexW4210966332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.