ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2021
Bacterial Cellulose Properties Fulfilling Requirements for a Biomaterial of Choice in Reconstructive Surgery and Wound Healing.
Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- Study on the preparation of multifunctional bacterial cellulose-based wound dressings and their in vitro hemostatic performance.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- From Design to Application: Advanced Cellulose Scaffolds for Engineered Tissue Regeneration.Polymers · 2026Review
- Biogenic polymer-based heart valve for congenital cardiac surgery.JTCVS open · 2026Article
- The emerging role of biomaterial applications in cerebral lymphatic surgical interventions: A narrative review.Biomaterials and biosystems · 2025Review
- Current Paradigms and Future Challenges in Harnessing Nanocellulose for Advanced Applications in Tissue Engineering: A Critical State-of-the-Art Review for Biomedicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Bacterial Cellulose/Graphene Oxide/Hydroxyapatite Biocomposite: A Scaffold from Sustainable Sources for Bone Tissue Engineering.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2025Article
- Fundamentals and Advances in Stimuli-Responsive Hydrogels and Their Applications: A Review.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Review
- Bacterial Cellulose: A Sustainable Source for Hydrogels and 3D-Printed Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Article
- Potential of Bacterial Cellulose in Reconstructive Surgery of Body Integumentary System: Preliminary Studies in Animals.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Article
- Exopolysaccharides Producing Bacteria: A Review.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- Acellular dermal matrix in reconstructive surgery: Applications, benefits, and cost.Frontiers in transplantation · 2023Review
- Bacterial Cellulose-Based Polymer Nanocomposites: A Review.Polymers · 2022Review
- Characterization of the Putative Acylated Cellulose Synthase Operon inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Comparative Analysis of Bacterial Cellulose Membranes Synthesized by ChosenInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although new therapeutic approaches for surgery and wound healing have recently made a great progress, there is still need for application of better and use novel methods to enhance biocompatibility as well as recovery and healing process. Bacterial Cellulose (BC) is natural cellulose in the form of nanostructure which has the advantages of being used in human body. The medical application of BC in reconstructive, cardiac and vascular surgery as well as wound healing is still under development, but without proved success of repetitive results. A review of studies on Bacterial Cellulose (BC) since 2016 was performed, taking into account the latest reports on the clinical use of BC. In addition, data on the physicochemical properties of BC were used. In all the works, satisfactory results of using Bacterial Cellulose were obtained. In all presented studies various BC implants demonstrated their best performance. Additionally, the works show that BC has the capacity to reach physiological as well as mechanical properties of relevance for various tissue replacement and can be produced in surgeons as well as patient specific expectations such as ear frames, vascular tubes or heart valves as well as wound healing dressings. Results of those experiments conform to those of previous reports utilizing ADM (acellular dermal matrix) and demonstrate that the use of BC has no adverse effects such as ulceration or extrusion and possesses expected properties. Based on preliminary animal as well as the few clinical data BC fittings are promising implants for various reconstructive applications since they are biocompatible with properties allowing blood flow, attach easily to wound bed and remain in place until donor site is healed properly. Additionally, this review shows that BC can be fabricated into patient specific shapes and size, with capability to reach mechanical properties of relevance for heart valve, ear, and muscle replacement. Bacterial cellulose appears, as shown in the above review, to be one of the materials that allow extensive application in the reconstruction after soft tissue defects. Review was created to show the needs of surgeons and the possibilities of using BC through the eyes and knowledge of biotechnologists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.