Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35223815›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2021

Bacterial Cellulose Properties Fulfilling Requirements for a Biomaterial of Choice in Reconstructive Surgery and Wound Healing.

Jerzy Jankau, Agata Błażyńska-Spychalska, Katarzyna Kubiak, Marzena Jędrzejczak-Krzepkowska, Teresa Pankiewicz, Karolina Ludwicka, Aleksandra Dettlaff, Rafał Pęksa

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Characterization of the Putative Acylated Cellulose Synthase Operon inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  16. Comparative Analysis of Bacterial Cellulose Membranes Synthesized by ChosenInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jerzy JankauDepartment of Plastic Surgery Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Agata Błażyńska-SpychalskaDepartment of Plastic Surgery Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Katarzyna KubiakInstitute of Molecular and Industrial Biotechnology Lodz, University of Technology, Łódź, Poland.
Marzena Jędrzejczak-KrzepkowskaInstitute of Molecular and Industrial Biotechnology Lodz, University of Technology, Łódź, Poland.
Teresa PankiewiczInstitute of Molecular and Industrial Biotechnology Lodz, University of Technology, Łódź, Poland.
Karolina LudwickaInstitute of Molecular and Industrial Biotechnology Lodz, University of Technology, Łódź, Poland.
Aleksandra DettlaffBowil Ltd, Władysławowo, Poland.
Rafał PęksaDepartment of Pathology, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
Lodz University of Technology · PLGdańsk Medical University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although new therapeutic approaches for surgery and wound healing have recently made a great progress, there is still need for application of better and use novel methods to enhance biocompatibility as well as recovery and healing process. Bacterial Cellulose (BC) is natural cellulose in the form of nanostructure which has the advantages of being used in human body. The medical application of BC in reconstructive, cardiac and vascular surgery as well as wound healing is still under development, but without proved success of repetitive results. A review of studies on Bacterial Cellulose (BC) since 2016 was performed, taking into account the latest reports on the clinical use of BC. In addition, data on the physicochemical properties of BC were used. In all the works, satisfactory results of using Bacterial Cellulose were obtained. In all presented studies various BC implants demonstrated their best performance. Additionally, the works show that BC has the capacity to reach physiological as well as mechanical properties of relevance for various tissue replacement and can be produced in surgeons as well as patient specific expectations such as ear frames, vascular tubes or heart valves as well as wound healing dressings. Results of those experiments conform to those of previous reports utilizing ADM (acellular dermal matrix) and demonstrate that the use of BC has no adverse effects such as ulceration or extrusion and possesses expected properties. Based on preliminary animal as well as the few clinical data BC fittings are promising implants for various reconstructive applications since they are biocompatible with properties allowing blood flow, attach easily to wound bed and remain in place until donor site is healed properly. Additionally, this review shows that BC can be fabricated into patient specific shapes and size, with capability to reach mechanical properties of relevance for heart valve, ear, and muscle replacement. Bacterial cellulose appears, as shown in the above review, to be one of the materials that allow extensive application in the reconstruction after soft tissue defects. Review was created to show the needs of surgeons and the possibilities of using BC through the eyes and knowledge of biotechnologists.

Indexed as

bacterial cellulose (BC)biocompatibility and biodegradabilitymechanical propertiesreconstructive surgerywound dressing

Identifiers

PMID35223815
PMCPMC8873821
OpenAlexW4211043846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.