ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2022
Strontium Ion Removal From Artificial Seawater Using a Combination of Adsorption With Biochar and Precipitation by Blowing CO
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Selective Adsorption of Sr(II) from Aqueous Solution by NaMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Highly efficient removal of SrRSC advances · 2024Article
- High strontium adsorption performance of layered zirconium phosphate intercalated with a crown ether.RSC advances · 2023Article
- Chestnut Shell-Activated Carbon Mixed with Pyrolytic Snail Shells for Methylene Blue Adsorption.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- New Process for the Sulfonation of Algal/PEI Biosorbent for Enhancing Sr(II) Removal from Aqueous Solutions-Application to Seawater.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Separation, purification, and crystallization of 1,5-pentanediamine hydrochloride from fermentation broth by cation resin.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While enjoying the convenience of nuclear energy development, the environmental contamination by radionuclide leakage is of significant concern. Because of its cost-effectiveness and environmental friendliness, biochar has attracted a lot of attention in the field of radioactive water treatment. Herein, a novel teak peel modified biochar (labeled as PMBN3) was prepared and applied to remove strontium from artificial seawater. The characterisation of the prepared PMBN3 showed it contains numerous oxygen-containing functional groups (i.e. carboxyl and hydroxyl groups), laminar morphology, mesoporous structure, large specific surface area. PMBN3 exhibited great advantages in Sr(II) adsorption, such as rapid adsorption kinetics (<1 h for equilibrium) and superior reusability. The adsorption of strontium by biochar is consistent with pseudo-second order and internal diffusion kinetic models. Among the four types of adsorption isotherms, the Freundlich isotherm showed the best fit with R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.