Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35223660›Full record

ArticleResearch and reports in urology2022

Impacts of Neoadjuvant Hormonal Therapy Prior to Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy on Postoperative Hormonal- and Sexual-Related Quality of Life - Assessment by Patient-Reported Questionnaire.

Soichiro Ogawa, Akihisa Hasegawa, Shunta Makabe, Akifumi Onagi, Kanako Matsuoka, Emina Kayama, Tomoyuki Koguchi, Junya Hata, Yuichi Sato, Hidenori Akaihata and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research and reports in urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Soichiro OgawaDepartment of Urology, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan.
Akihisa HasegawaDepartment of Urology, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan.
Shunta MakabeDepartment of Urology, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan.
Akifumi OnagiDepartment of Urology, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan.
Kanako MatsuokaDepartment of Urology, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan.
Emina KayamaDepartment of Urology, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan.
Tomoyuki KoguchiDepartment of Urology, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan.
Junya HataDepartment of Urology, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan.
Yuichi SatoDepartment of Urology, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan.
Hidenori AkaihataDepartment of Urology, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan.
Masao KataokaDepartment of Urology, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan.
Nobuhiro HagaDepartment of Urology, Fukuoka University Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan.
Yoshiyuki KojimaDepartment of Urology, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNeoadjuvant hormonal therapy (HT) before radical prostatectomy (RP) is not recommended by current guidelines in terms of oncological outcomes. Despite this, neoadjuvant HT is sometimes conducted before RP for a small proportion of patients in clinical practice. This study evaluated the impacts of neoadjuvant HT on hormonal- and sexual-related quality of life (QOL) among patients who underwent robot-assisted RP (RARP). MATERIALS AND

methodsParticipants comprised 470 patients divided into a non-neoadjuvant HT group (n = 408) and a neoadjuvant HT group (n = 62). Hormonal- and sexual-related QOL were measured using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) questionnaire.

resultsHormonal summary scores at 6 and 9 months, function scores before and 3, 6, and 9 months and bother score at 6 months after RARP were significantly lower in the neoadjuvant HT group than in the non-neoadjuvant HT group. Sexual function scores were decreased in the neoadjuvant HT group compared to the non-neoadjuvant HT group before and 6 months after RARP. In the neoadjuvant HT group, sexual function at 3 months after RARP was significantly worse in patients with >5 months of neoadjuvant HT than in patients with ≤5 months of neoadjuvant HT. Conversely, sexual bother at 3 months after RARP was significantly worse in patients with ≤5 months of neoadjuvant HT than in patients with >5 months of neoadjuvant HT.

conclusionVintage neoadjuvant HT prior to RARP should not be recommended due to not only oncological outcomes, but also the impacts on postoperative hormonal- and sexual-related QOL.

Indexed as

androgen deprivation therapyExpanded Prostate Cancer Index Compositehormonal therapyneoadjuvantquality of liferobot-assisted radical prostatectomy

Identifiers

PMID35223660
PMCPMC8865904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.