ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021
miR-22 and miR-205 Drive Tumor Aggressiveness of Mucoepidermoid Carcinomas of Salivary Glands.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- MicroRNAs in Salivary Gland Cancers Associated with Poor Prognosis: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Pooled it
- Incorporating Immunotherapies into the Evolving Standard of Care for Pediatric B-Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.Paediatric drugs · 2026Review
- MicroRNA Profiles Distinguishing Metastatic from Non-Metastatic Salivary Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Salivary Gland Cancers in the Era of Molecular Analysis: The Role of Tissue and Liquid Biomarkers.Cancers · 2025Review
- Comprehensive investigation of matrix metalloproteinases in skin cutaneous melanoma: diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic insights.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Systematic identification of pathological mechanisms, prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets by integrating lncRNA expression variation in salivary gland mucoepidermoid carcinoma.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Review of the Different Outcomes Produced by Genetic Knock Out of the Long Non-coding microRNA-host-gene MIR22HGMicroRNA (Shariqah, United Arab Emirates) · 2025Review
- Comparison of miRNA Profiles of Primary Tumors and Metastatic Tumors of Salivary Gland Tumors and Their Role in Prognosis: A Systematic Review.Iranian journal of public health · 2024Review
- Molecular Aspects of Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma and Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma of the Salivary Gland.Head and neck pathology · 2024Review
- Dynamic Role of miRNAs in Salivary Gland Carcinomas: From Biomarkers to Therapeutic Targets.Head and neck pathology · 2024Review
- Novel human lymph node-derived matrix supports the adhesion of metastatic oral carcinoma cells.BMC cancer · 2023Article
- Milk-Derived miR-22-3p Promotes Proliferation of Human Intestinal Epithelial Cells (HIECs) by Regulating Gene Expression.Nutrients · 2022Article
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors at 10 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo integrate mRNA and miRNA expression profiles of mucoepidermoid carcinomas (MECs) and normal salivary gland (NSGs) tissue samples and identify potential drivers. MATERIAL AND
methodsGene and miRNA expression arrays were performed in 35 MECs and six NSGs.
resultsWe found 46 differentially expressed (DE) miRNAs and 3,162 DE mRNAs. Supervised hierarchical clustering analysis of the DE transcripts revealed two clusters in both miRNA and mRNA profiles, which distinguished MEC from NSG samples. The integrative miRNA-mRNA analysis revealed a network comprising 696 negatively correlated interactions (44 miRNAs and 444 mRNAs) involving cell signaling, cell cycle, and cancer-related pathways. Increased expression levels of miR-205-5p and miR-224-5p and decreased expression levels of miR-139-3p, miR-145-3p, miR-148a-3p, miR-186-5p, miR-338-3p, miR-363-3p, and miR-4324 were significantly related to worse overall survival in MEC patients. Two overexpressed miRNAs in MEC (miR-22 and miR-205) were selected for inhibition by the CRISPR-Cas9 method. Cell viability, migration, and invasion assays were performed using an intermediate grade MEC cell line. Knockout of miR-205 reduced cell viability and enhanced
conclusionThe
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.