Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35223277›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

Wagner's Classification as a Tool for Treating Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Our Observations at a Suburban Teaching Hospital.

Priti Shah, Ramteja Inturi, Dinesh Anne, Digvijay Jadhav, Varsha Viswambharan, Reina Khadilkar, Anuradha Dnyanmote, Shivangi Shahi

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Priti ShahSurgery, Dr DY Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, IND.
Ramteja InturiSurgery, Dr DY Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, IND.
Dinesh AnneSurgery, Dr DY Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, IND.
Digvijay JadhavSurgery, Dr DY Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, IND.
Varsha ViswambharanSurgery, Dr DY Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, IND.
Reina KhadilkarSurgery, Dr DY Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, IND.
Anuradha DnyanmoteSurgery, Dr DY Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, IND.
Shivangi ShahiSurgery, Dr DY Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, IND.
Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives The study aims to scale patients with diabetic foot ulcers according to Wagner's classification, measure the various risk factors, study various outcomes and improve the treatment measures. Methodology The article presents materials on a prospective observational study of 50 diabetic foot patients with different presentations who underwent stage-specific intervention. Results Poor glycemic control, lifestyle factors, and smoking showed increased risks for foot ulcer complications. Diabetic neuropathy and vasculopathy have been significant outcome predictors. As a result, advanced Wagner's grades showed increased amputation risks and multimodal management. Conclusions Stratification of diabetic foot patients and appropriate management based on their Wagner's grade helps reduce amputation rates and mortality. In addition, multimodal management and exceptional attention to diabetes and lifestyle control improve long-term outcomes.

Indexed as

amputationsdiabetesdiabetic footneuropathyperipheral vascular diseaseulcer

Identifiers

PMID35223277
PMCPMC8861474
OpenAlexW4207067054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.