Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35223270›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Cervical Spine Trauma: More Than Soft Tissue Illustration.

George Fotakopoulos, Alexandros G Brotis, Konstantinos N Fountas

Open access · diamondAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Prognostic MRI parameters in acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

George FotakopoulosNeurosurgery, General University Hospital of Larisa, Larisa, GRC.
Alexandros G BrotisNeurosurgery, General University Hospital of Larisa, Larisa, GRC.
Konstantinos N FountasNeurosurgery, General University Hospital of Larisa, Larisa, GRC.
404 General Military Hospital · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in cervical spine trauma is limited to visualizing soft tissues such as the intervertebral disc, the spinal cord, and hematomas. Herein, we present the case of a 60-year-old man who was transferred to our hospital with neck pain after a cervical spine trauma associated with a motor vehicle accident. The initial computed tomography imaging of the cervical spine showed stable linear fractures at the C2, C6, and C7 vertebral bodies, for which the patient received conservative management. The patient showed remarkable clinical improvement three months later, but the linear fractures at the subaxial spine remained unchanged on computed tomography (CT). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scantly differentiated active from inactive bone lesions and prevented unnecessary interventions. Therefore, we suggest that the MRI is of value in cases with a clinical and radiological mismatch. A mismatch is considered in cases when there is a high level of clinical suspicion for a spinal fracture, whereas CT images fail to provide direct evidence of a bone fracture. In such cases, MRI offers indirect evidence of bony trauma, such as bone marrow edema, visualized as a high-intensity signal in T2-weighted images. Furthermore, specialized spine trauma MRI protocols could be of value in selected cases.

Indexed as

cervical-spinecomputed tomographymagnetic resonance imagingmisdiagnosistrauma

Identifiers

PMID35223270
PMCPMC8860237
OpenAlexW4207056967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.