ArticleCureus2022
Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Cervical Spine Trauma: More Than Soft Tissue Illustration.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Narrative Review of Combat Sports Injuries With a Particular Focus on Cervical Spine Injuries.Cureus · 2024Review
- Prognostic MRI parameters in acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in cervical spine trauma is limited to visualizing soft tissues such as the intervertebral disc, the spinal cord, and hematomas. Herein, we present the case of a 60-year-old man who was transferred to our hospital with neck pain after a cervical spine trauma associated with a motor vehicle accident. The initial computed tomography imaging of the cervical spine showed stable linear fractures at the C2, C6, and C7 vertebral bodies, for which the patient received conservative management. The patient showed remarkable clinical improvement three months later, but the linear fractures at the subaxial spine remained unchanged on computed tomography (CT). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scantly differentiated active from inactive bone lesions and prevented unnecessary interventions. Therefore, we suggest that the MRI is of value in cases with a clinical and radiological mismatch. A mismatch is considered in cases when there is a high level of clinical suspicion for a spinal fracture, whereas CT images fail to provide direct evidence of a bone fracture. In such cases, MRI offers indirect evidence of bony trauma, such as bone marrow edema, visualized as a high-intensity signal in T2-weighted images. Furthermore, specialized spine trauma MRI protocols could be of value in selected cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.