ArticlePeerJ2022
Comparative analyses of chloroplast genomes in 'Red Fuji' apples: low rate of chloroplast genome mutations.
Article in PeerJ, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Pan-Plastome of Walnuts (International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Comparative Genomics and Phylogenetics of Chloroplasts Reveal Lower Rates of Genetic Variation in Mango (Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- A Haplotype-resolved, Chromosome-scale Genome for Malus domestica Borkh. 'WA 38'.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2024Article
- Comparative and phylogenetic analysis of the complete chloroplast genomes of 10 Artemisia selengensis resources based on high-throughput sequencing.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Article
- Complete chloroplast genome sequences of the ornamental plant Prunus cistena and comparative and phylogenetic analyses with its closely related species.BMC genomics · 2023Article
- Molecular Structure and Variation Characteristics of the Plastomes from SixBiomolecules · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFuji is a vital apple cultivar, and has been propagated clonally for nearly a century. The chloroplast genome variation of Fuji apples in China has not been investigated.
methodsThis study used next-generation high-throughput sequencing and bioinformatics to compare and analyze the chloroplast genome of 24 Red Fuji varieties from nine regions in China.
resultsThe results showed that the 24 chloroplast genomes were highly conserved in genome size, structure, and organization. The length of the genomes ranged from 160,063 to 160,070 bp, and the GC content was 36.6%. Each of the 24 chloroplast genomes encoded 131 genes, including 84 protein-coding genes, 37 tRNA genes, and eight rRNA genes. The results of repeat sequence detection were consistent; the most common sequence was forward repeats (53.1%), and the least common sequence was complementary repeats (4.1%). The chloroplast genome sequence of Red Fuji was highly conserved. Two indels were detected, but the PI value was 0, and there were no SNP loci. The chloroplast genome variation rate of Red Fuji was low.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.