Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35223205›Full record

ReviewPeerJ2022

Methodological approaches for estimating populations of the endangered dhole

Girish A Punjabi, Linnea Worsøe Havmøller, Rasmus Worsøe Havmøller, Dusit Ngoprasert, Arjun Srivathsa

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in PeerJ, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Girish A PunjabiDhole Working Group, IUCN/SCC Canid Specialist Group, The Recanati Kaplan Centre, Tubney House, Tubney, United Kingdom.
Linnea Worsøe HavmøllerDhole Working Group, IUCN/SCC Canid Specialist Group, The Recanati Kaplan Centre, Tubney House, Tubney, United Kingdom.
Rasmus Worsøe HavmøllerResearch and Collections, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Dusit NgoprasertConservation Ecology Program, King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi, Bangkok, Thailand.
Arjun SrivathsaDhole Working Group, IUCN/SCC Canid Specialist Group, The Recanati Kaplan Centre, Tubney House, Tubney, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large carnivores are important for maintaining ecosystem integrity and attract much research and conservation interest. For most carnivore species, estimating population density or abundance is challenging because they do not have unique markings for individual identification. This hinders status assessments for many threatened species, and calls for testing new methodological approaches. We examined past efforts to assess the population status of the endangered dhole (

Indexed as

CanidaeCarnivoraPantheraAnimalsEcosystemPopulation DensityCamera trappingCanidsConservation monitoringModel evaluationSite-based abundanceSpace-to-eventTime-to-eventUnmarked species

Identifiers

PMID35223205
PMCPMC8877337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.