ArticleDermatology practical & conceptual2022
Isotretinoin Treatment Practices and Outcomes in Acne Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Single Center, Retrospective, Comparative Study.
Article in Dermatology practical & conceptual, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding acne among university students.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Prescribing and Dispensing of Oral Isotretinoin and Noncompliance with Recommendations in France before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic.Dermatology and therapy · 2025Article
- Teledermatology for Common Inflammatory Skin Conditions: The Medicine of the Future?Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe COVID-19 pandemic drastically changed the priorities in healthcare services; outpatient management of acne has changed during this period.
objectivesWe aimed to investigate treatment practices, outcomes and identify modified follow-up schedules applied during the pandemic.
methodsThe patients who were admitted to dermatology outpatient clinic between March 13 and July 13, 2020, were included. Patients who were admitted between March 13 and July 13, 2019, were served as controls for the study. For each patient, age, gender, treatment protocols, treatment intervals, compliance with the treatment, treatment modifications, and adverse events were recorded.
resultsThe total number of acne patients admitted to dermatology outpatient clinics during the pandemic period was 278 and consisted of 12.3% (278) of all admissions. Isotretinoin treatment was started in only 16 (5.8%) of the patients. The proportion of patients who were under follow-up was significantly higher during the pandemic period (P < 0.005). There was no difference between the pandemic period and the non-pandemic period in terms of starting isotretinoin treatment (P > 0.05). During pandemic period, 79% of the patients who used isotretinoin were followed-up every two or more months. Extended follow-up intervals showed no difference for detecting side effects (P > 0.05).
conclusionsAcne patients constitute an important part of dermatology outpatient clinics. During the pandemic period, majority of acne patients came for follow-up. Extended follow-up periods were adopted by physicians and were found safe and effective in the current study. Thus, isotretinoin treatment seems efficacious and safe during pandemic period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.