Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35223173›Full record

ArticleDermatology practical & conceptual2022

Acne Supplements Sold Online.

Emily Burns, Milbrey Parke, Ariadna Perez-Sanchez, Dina Zamil, Rajani Katta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dermatology practical & conceptual, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emily BurnsBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Milbrey ParkeBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Ariadna Perez-SanchezDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Dina ZamilBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Rajani KattaDepartment of Dermatology, McGovern Medical School at University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAs no centralized database of acne supplements is available, we aimed to provide an overview of these products, with a focus on safety.

objectivesThe objectives of this study were to document the number, formulation, contents, and marketing strategies utilized by acne supplements sold online.

methodsAn online search was conducted between March and May 2020. Products were included in the study if they used the terms: "whitehead", "blackhead", or "acne". Data were extracted from the website, box, and Supplement Facts label.

results49 products were identified, which contained 146 unique ingredients. These included vitamins, minerals, food extracts, botanical extracts, amino acids, animal products, and distinct microbial strains. Few (4.1%) products were tested by third parties.

conclusionsThis survey of acne supplements available online raised concerns regarding lack of warning labels, teratogenicity, exceedingly large levels of vitamins and minerals, and lack of third-party testing. Given the limited regulation and oversight of dietary supplements, it is imperative that physicians educate patients on the potential risks of these products.

Indexed as

acne supplementdietdietary supplementnutritionsafety

Identifiers

PMID35223173
PMCPMC8824547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.