Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35223087›Full record

ArticleActa radiologica open2022

MRI interobserver reliability in rectal tumor angulation.

Malene Rv Pedersen, Peter O Otto, Helle Precht, Søren R Rafaelsen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta radiologica open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Malene Rv PedersenDepartment of Radiology, Vejle Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5167-7968
Peter O OttoDepartment of Radiology, Vejle Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.
Helle PrechtDepartment of Regional Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Søren R RafaelsenDepartment of Radiology, Vejle Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.
University of Southern Denmark · DKVejle Sygehus · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhen rectal tumors are examined using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) the perpendicular angulation of the axial T2-weighted image to the tumor axis is essential for a correct measure of the shortest distance between tumor and mesorectal facia. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the interobserver variability in rectal tumor angulation between a radiologist and a radiographer. MATERIAL AND

methodsTwo observers performed the angulation independently. All MRI examinations were performed using an MRI 1.5 Tesla unit. A Bland-Altman plot was used to assess the interobserver variance and Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) statistic was used to assess the interobserver reliability.

resultsMRI was performed in 55 patients with rectal cancer during a one-year period (25 (45.5%) women and 30 (54.5%) men). The median age was 71 years (range 46-87 years). The rectal tumor mean length was 3.9 cm. The interobserver reliability was good (ICC = 0.83, 95% confidence interval 0.72-0.90).

conclusionRadiographers receiving training will be able to perform MRI rectal tumor angulation.

Indexed as

interobserver reliabilitymagnetic resonance imagingradiographerRectal tumor

Identifiers

PMID35223087
PMCPMC8874163
OpenAlexW4213072163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.