Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35223068›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2022

Emergence of splits and collective turns in pigeon flocks under predation.

Marina Papadopoulou, Hanno Hildenbrandt, Daniel W E Sankey, Steven J Portugal, Charlotte K Hemelrijk

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
18.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Dynamics of collective motion across time and species.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  15. Inferring social influence in animal groups across multiple timescales.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  16. A multi-scale review of the dynamics of collective behaviour: from rapid responses to ontogeny and evolution.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  17. Multispecies collective waving behaviour in fish.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  18. Characterization of bird formations using fuzzy modelling.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Marina PapadopoulouGroningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6478-8365
Hanno HildenbrandtGroningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Daniel W E SankeyCentre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6363-8023
Steven J PortugalDepartment of Biological Sciences, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2438-2352
Charlotte K HemelrijkGroningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6160-077X
University of Groningen · NLRoyal Holloway University of London · GBUniversity of Exeter · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complex patterns of collective behaviour may emerge through self-organization, from local interactions among individuals in a group. To understand what behavioural rules underlie these patterns, computational models are often necessary. These rules have not yet been systematically studied for bird flocks under predation. Here, we study airborne flocks of homing pigeons attacked by a robotic falcon, combining empirical data with a species-specific computational model of collective escape. By analysing GPS trajectories of flocking individuals, we identify two new patterns of collective escape: early splits and collective turns, occurring even at large distances from the predator. To examine their formation, we extend an agent-based model of pigeons with a 'discrete' escape manoeuvre by a single initiator, namely a sudden turn interrupting the continuous coordinated motion of the group. Both splits and collective turns emerge from this rule. Their relative frequency depends on the angular velocity and position of the initiator in the flock: sharp turns by individuals at the periphery lead to more splits than collective turns. We confirm this association in the empirical data. Our study highlights the importance of discrete and uncoordinated manoeuvres in the collective escape of bird flocks and advocates the systematic study of their patterns across species.

Indexed as

collective behaviourescape patternsflockingpigeonself-organization

Identifiers

PMID35223068
PMCPMC8864349
OpenAlexW4214582168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.