Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35222990›Full record

ArticleF1000Research2021

Performing post-genome-wide association study analysis: overview, challenges and recommendations.

Yagoub Adam, Chaimae Samtal, Jean-Tristan Brandenburg, Oluwadamilare Falola, Ezekiel Adebiyi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in F1000Research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Frontiers in plant science · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. SABER: Statistical Identification of Loci of Interest in GWAS Summary Statistics using a Bayesian Gaussian Mixture Model.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Yagoub AdamCovenant University Bioinformatics Research (CUBRe), Covenant University, Ota, Ogun, 112233, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0001-6874-2543
Chaimae SamtalLaboratory of Biotechnology, Environment, Agri-food and Health, Sidi Mohammed Ben Abdellah University, Fez, Fez-Meknes, 30000, Morocco.ORCID 0000-0003-4899-7463
Jean-Tristan BrandenburgSydney Brenner Institute for Molecular Bioscience (SBIMB), University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-0197-2648
Oluwadamilare FalolaLaboratory of Biotechnology, Environment, Agri-food and Health, Sidi Mohammed Ben Abdellah University, Fez, Fez-Meknes, 30000, Morocco.
Ezekiel AdebiyiCovenant University Bioinformatics Research (CUBRe), Covenant University, Ota, Ogun, 112233, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0002-1390-2359
Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University · MACovenant University · NGGerman Cancer Research Center · DEUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZA

Funding

H3ABioNet: informatics solutions for H3AfricaU24HG006941 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN · PI MULDER, NICOLA · 2017 to 2021
$12.9M
Shared Core: Biobanking, Bioinformatics and Data ManagementU54HG006938 · NHGRI · WITS HEALTH CONSORTIUM (PTY), LTD · PI RAMSAY, MICHELE MICHELE · 2012 to 2022
$12.2M
WEST AFRICAN SUSTAINABLE LEADERSHIP AND INNOVATION TRAINING IN BIOINFORMATICS RESEARCH (WASLITBRe)U2RTW010679 · FIC · COVENANT UNIVERSITY · PI ADEBIYI, EZEKIEL FEMI, AMOAKO-YIRENKYI, PETER · 2017 to 2021
$1.4M
FIC NIH HHS U2R TW010679NHGRI NIH HHS U24 HG006941NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG006938
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) provide  huge information on statistically significant single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with various human complex traits and diseases. By performing GWAS studies, scientists have successfully identified the association of hundreds of thousands to  millions of SNPs to a single phenotype. Moreover, the association of some SNPs with rare diseases has been intensively tested. However, classic GWAS studies have not yet provided solid, knowledgeable insight into functional and biological mechanisms underlying phenotypes or mechanisms of diseases. Therefore, several post-GWAS (pGWAS) methods have been recommended. Currently, there is no simple scientific document to provide a quick guide for performing pGWAS analysis. pGWAS is a crucial step for a better understanding of the biological machinery beyond the SNPs. Here, we provide an overview to performing pGWAS analysis and demonstrate the challenges behind each method. Furthermore, we direct readers to key articles for each pGWAS method and present the overall issues in pGWAS analysis.  Finally, we include a custom pGWAS pipeline to guide new users when performing their research.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePhenotypeGWASMeta-analysispGWASPostGWAS

Identifiers

PMID35222990
PMCPMC8847724
OpenAlexW3203388711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.