ArticleJournal of healthcare engineering2022
Analysis of the Diagnosis Model of Peripheral Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer under Computed Tomography Images.
Article in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Retracted: Analysis of the Diagnosis Model of Peripheral Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer under Computed Tomography Images.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2023Article
- AI/ML advances in non-small cell lung cancer biomarker discovery.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- A Comprehensive Survey on the Progress, Process, and Challenges of Lung Cancer Detection and Classification.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-10-11Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Informed/Patient Consent - None/Withdrawn · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Lack of IRB/IACUC Approval and/or Compliance · Paper Mill · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to explore the effect of deep learning models on lung CT image lung parenchymal segmentation (LPS) and the application value of CT image texture features in the diagnosis of peripheral non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Data of peripheral lung cancer (PLC) patients was collected retrospectively and was divided into peripheral SCLC group and peripheral NSCLC group according to the pathological examination results, ResNet50 model and feature pyramid network (FPN) algorithm were undertaken to improve the Mask-RCNN model, and after the MaZda software extracted the texture features of the CT images of PLC patients, the Fisher coefficient was used to reduce the dimensionality, and the texture features of the CT images were analyzed and compared. The results showed that the average Dice coefficients of the 2D CH algorithm, Faster-RCNN, Mask-RCNN, and the algorithm proposed in the validation set were 0.882, 0.953, 0.961, and 0.986, respectively. The accuracy rates were 88.3%, 93.5%, 94.4%, and 97.2%. The average segmentation speeds in lung CT images were 0.289 s/sheet, 0.115 s/sheet, 0.108 s/sheet, and 0.089 s/sheet. The improved deep learning model showed higher accuracy, better robustness, and faster speed than other algorithms in the LPS of CT images. In summary, deep learning can achieve the LPS of CT images and show excellent segmentation efficiency. The texture parameters of GLCM in CT images have excellent differential diagnosis performance for NSCLC and SCLC and potential clinical application value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.