Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35222784›Full record

ArticleEvolution2021

Development and validation of a framework for the assessment of school curricula on the presence of evolutionary concepts (FACE).

Xana Sá-Pinto, Giulia Realdon, Gregor Torkar, Bruno Sousa, Martha Georgiou, Alex Jeffries, Konstantinos Korfiatis, Silvia Paolucci, Patrícia Pessoa, Joana Rocha and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Xana Sá-PintoResearch Centre on Didactics and Technology in the Education of Trainers, Department of Education and Psychology, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.
Giulia RealdonUNICAMearth Group, Geology Section, University of Camerino, Camerino, Italy.
Gregor TorkarUniversity of Ljubljana Faculty of Education, Kardeljeva ploščad 16, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Bruno SousaAlpoente, Agrupamento de Escolas de Albufeira Poente, Albufeira, Portugal.
Martha GeorgiouDepartment of Biology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Alex JeffriesMilner Centre for Evolution, Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
Konstantinos KorfiatisDepartment of Education, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Silvia PaolucciLaboratorio di Scienze Sperimentali, Foligno, Italy.
Patrícia PessoaResearch Centre on Didactics and Technology in the Education of Trainers, Department of Education and Psychology, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.
Joana RochaUniversity of Trás-Os-Montes E Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal.
Panagiotis K StasinakisAmpelokipoi Laboratory Centre for Natural Sciences (EKFE), Athens, Greece.
Bento CavadasIPsantarém, Polytechnic Institute of Santarém-School of Education, Santarém, Portugal.
Angelica CrottiniCIBIO/InBio InBIO, Universidade Do Porto, Centro de Investigação Em Biodiversidade E Recursos Genéticos, Campus Agrario de Vairão, 4485-661 Vairão, Portugal.
Tanja GnidovecUniversity of Ljubljana Faculty of Education, Kardeljeva ploščad 16, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Teresa NogueiraINIAV, National Institute for Agrarian and Veterinary Research, Oeiras and Vairão, Portugal.
Penelope PapadopoulouDepartment of Early Childhood Education, University of Western Macedonia, Kozani, Greece.
Costanza PiccoliCIBIO/InBio InBIO, Universidade Do Porto, Centro de Investigação Em Biodiversidade E Recursos Genéticos, Campus Agrario de Vairão, 4485-661 Vairão, Portugal.
Johan BarstadUniversity College of Green Development, Bryne, Norway.
Heloise D DufourLe Cercle FSER, Paris, France.
Milena PejchinovskaFaculty of Education, "St. Kliment Ohridski" University, Bitola, North Macedonia.
Alma PobricFaculty of Science, University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Dragana CvetkovićChair of Genetics and Evolution, Faculty of Biology, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Evangelia MavrikakiFaculty of Primary Education, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Navarinou 13A, 10680 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-9029-6340

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evolution is a key concept of biology, fundamental to understand the world and address important societal problems, but research studies show that it is still not widely understood and accepted. Several factors are known to influence evolution acceptance and understanding, but little information is available regarding the impacts of the curriculum on these aspects. Very few curricula have been examined to assess the coverage of biological evolution. The available studies do not allow comparative analyses, due to the different methodologies employed by the authors. However, such an analysis would be useful for research purposes and for the development of appropriate educational policies to address the problem of a lack of evolution acceptance in some countries. In this paper we describe the steps through which we developed a valid and reliable instrument for curricula analysis known as FACE: "Framework to Assess the Coverage of biological Evolution by school curricula." This framework was developed based on the "Understanding Evolution Conceptual Framework" (UECF). After an initial pilot study, our framework was reformulated based on identified issues and experts' opinions. To generate validity and reliability evidence in support of the framework, it was applied to four European countries' curricula. For each country, a team of a minimum of two national and two foreign coders worked independently to assess the curriculum using this framework for content analysis. Reliability evidence was estimated using Krippendorf's alpha and resulted in appropriate values for coding the examined curricula. Some issues that coders faced during the analysis were discussed and, to ensure better reliability for future researchers, additional guidelines and one extra category were included in the framework. The final version of the framework includes six categories and 34 subcategories. FACE is a useful tool for the analysis and the comparison of curricula and school textbooks regarding the coverage of evolution, and such results can guide curricula development.

Indexed as

Content analysisCurricula analysisEvolution educationLearning goals

Identifiers

PMID35222784
PMCPMC8827349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.