ArticleJournal of child & adolescent trauma2022
Trauma-Informed Intervention with Children: Integrating the CANS Assessment with the ARC Framework in a Clinical Setting.
Article in Journal of child & adolescent trauma, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Epidemiological characteristics of pediatric trauma and the role of the Injury Severity Score in predicting mortality risk: a multicenter study.European journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
- State of the Evidence of Attachment Regulation and Competency Framework and Adaptions: A Rapid Scoping Review.Journal of child & adolescent trauma · 2024Article
- Childhood Trauma and Exposure to Violence Interventions: The Need for Effective and Feasible Evidence-Based Interventions.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Examining the Effects of Adverse Childhood Experiences and Gender on Trauma-Informed Intervention Outcomes.Journal of child & adolescent trauma · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ongoing trauma-focused assessment is critical to developing trauma-informed treatment plans. The current study examines the clinical benefits of utilizing the Child and Adolescent Needs and Strengths (CANS) assessment to guide intervention based on the Attachment, Self-Regulation, and Competency (ARC) model to address children's trauma related symptoms in a rural state. WV CANS was developed by adapting the language of original CANS to be culturally specific to the state's unique situation and culture in consultation with the original CANS developer. This study included the data from children who received mental health services under WV CANS-ARC mapping from 2017 to 2019. Children's trauma-related symptoms are assessed using the WV CANS at intake and every 90 days to identify any changes in their symptoms. In order to examine the changes of traumatic symptoms over time, the study was limited to children who have at least three time points, with a total of 362 children used for the current analyses using Multilevel modeling with SAS PROC MIXED. The study found that children's trauma related symptoms significantly decreased in all ARC outcome domains over time after adjusting for basic demographic variables. The current study contributes to the evidence on treatment for children's trauma-related symptoms, especially with the application of the CANS-ARC mapping in a real-world clinical setting. The findings have significant implications for clinicians in integrating the assessment and treatment process using CANS-ARC mapping and for cross-system collaboration with continuity of care serving children who have experienced trauma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.