Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35222292›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2021

SARS-CoV-2 Variant Determination Through SNP Assays in Samples From Industry Workers From Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Bianca Monteiro Henriques-Santos, Bruna Farjun, Isadora Alonso Corrêa, Janaina de Barros Figueiredo, Antonio Augusto Fidalgo-Neto, Sergio Noboru Kuriyama

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bianca Monteiro Henriques-SantosSESI Innovation Center for Occupational Health, Industry Federation of the State of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Bruna FarjunSESI Innovation Center for Occupational Health, Industry Federation of the State of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Isadora Alonso CorrêaDepartment of Virology, Paulo de Góes Institute of Microbiology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Janaina de Barros FigueiredoSESI Innovation Center for Occupational Health, Industry Federation of the State of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Antonio Augusto Fidalgo-NetoSENAI Innovation Institute for Green Chemistry, Industry Federation of the State of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Sergio Noboru KuriyamaSESI Innovation Center for Occupational Health, Industry Federation of the State of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Serviço Nacional de Aprendizagem Industrial · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the first reported case in December 2019, SARS-CoV-2 infections have become a major public health worldwide. Even with the increasing vaccination in several countries and relaxing of social distancing measures, the pandemic remains a threat especially due to the emergence of new SARS-CoV-2 variants. Despite the presence of an enzyme capable of proofreading its genome, high rates of replication provide a source of accumulation of mutations within the viral genome. In this retrospective study, samples from a cohort of industry workers tested by the SESI's COVID-19 mass testing program from September 2020 to May 2021 were analyzed using a mutation panel in order to describe the circulation of currently identified SARS-CoV-2 variants within the samples obtained in Rio de Janeiro State. Our results demonstrated that the variant of interest (VOI) Zeta has been in circulation since October 2020 and reached 87% of prevalence in February 2021 followed by a decrease due to the emergence of Gamma variant of concern (VOC). Gamma was detected in January 2021 in our studied population, and its prevalence increased during the following months, reaching absolute prevalence within positive samples in May. The Alpha variant was detected only in 4-7% of samples during March and April while Beta VOC was not detected in our study. Our data agree with sequencing genomic surveillance databases and highlight the importance of continuous mass testing programs and variant detection in order to control viral spread and guide public health measures.

Indexed as

AlphacoronavirusGammaSARS-CoV-2SNP assayvariantZeta

Identifiers

PMID35222292
PMCPMC8863740
OpenAlexW4211105365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.