Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35222020›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2022

Sintilimab Plus Bevacizumab Biosimilar Versus Sorafenib as First-Line Treatment for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Ye Peng, Xiaohui Zeng, Liubao Peng, Qiao Liu, Lidan Yi, Xia Luo, Sini Li, Liting Wang, Shuxia Qin, Xiaomin Wan and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ye PengDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Xiaohui ZengPET-CT Center, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Liubao PengDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Qiao LiuDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Lidan YiDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Xia LuoDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Sini LiXiangya School of Nursing, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Liting WangDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Shuxia QinDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Xiaomin WanDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Chongqing TanDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University · CNCentral South University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

bevacizumab biosimilarcost-effectivenesshepatocellular carcinomamarkov modelsintilimab

Identifiers

PMID35222020
PMCPMC8864224
OpenAlexW4210934974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.