Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35222019›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2022

Non-Vitamin K Oral Anticoagulant After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Dongxu Li, Xiaofang Ma, Xu Zhou, Yongjun Qian

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Comparing Vitamin K Antagonists and Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Meta-Analysis.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Novel oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in transcatheter aortic valve replacement treated patients-Patients' vulnerability still matters.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dongxu LiDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Xiaofang MaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Emergency Medical Laboratory, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Xu ZhouEvidence-based Medicine Research Center, Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, China.
Yongjun QianDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
West China Hospital of Sichuan University · CNJiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNSichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

bleedingmortalitynon-vitamin K oral anticoagulantstroketranscatheter aortic valve replacement

Identifiers

PMID35222019
PMCPMC8880334
OpenAlexW4210995777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.