ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2022
A Spatiotemporal Brain Network Analysis of Alzheimer's Disease Based on Persistent Homology.
Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Node persistence from topological data analysis reveals changes in brain functional connectivity.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Evaluating topological and graph-theoretical approaches to extract complex multimodal brain connectivity patterns in multiple sclerosis.Health information science and systems · 2025Article
- Topological Embedding of Human Brain Networks with Applications to Dynamics of Temporal Lobe Epilepsy.ArXiv · 2024Article
- Topological state-space estimation of functional human brain networks.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Altered topological structure of the brain white matter in maltreated children through topological data analysis.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- A deep learning framework for identifying Alzheimer's disease using fMRI-based brain network.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Current brain network studies based on persistent homology mainly focus on the spatial evolution over multiple spatial scales, and there is little research on the evolution of a spatiotemporal brain network of Alzheimer's disease (AD). This paper proposed a persistent homology-based method by combining multiple temporal windows and spatial scales to study the spatiotemporal evolution of brain functional networks. Specifically, a time-sliding window method was performed to establish a spatiotemporal network, and the persistent homology-based features of such a network were obtained. We evaluated our proposed method using the resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) data set from Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) with 31 patients with AD and 37 normal controls (NCs). In the statistical analysis experiment, most network properties showed a better statistical power in spatiotemporal networks than in spatial networks. Moreover, compared to the standard graph theory properties in spatiotemporal networks, the persistent homology-based features detected more significant differences between the groups. In the clustering experiment, the brain networks on the sliding windows of all subjects were clustered into two highly structured connection states. Compared to the NC group, the AD group showed a longer residence time and a higher window ratio in a weak connection state, which may be because patients with AD have not established a firm connection. In summary, we constructed a spatiotemporal brain network containing more detailed information, and the dynamic spatiotemporal brain network analysis method based on persistent homology provides stronger adaptability and robustness in revealing the abnormalities of the functional organization of patients with AD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.