Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35221860›Full record

ArticleSoftware and systems modeling2022

AI-driven streamlined modeling: experiences and lessons learned from multiple domains.

Sagar Sunkle, Krati Saxena, Ashwini Patil, Vinay Kulkarni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Software and systems modeling, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sagar SunkleTata Consultancy Services Research, Pune, 411013 India.
Krati SaxenaTata Consultancy Services Research, Pune, 411013 India.
Ashwini PatilTata Consultancy Services Research, Pune, 411013 India.
Vinay KulkarniTata Consultancy Services Research, Pune, 411013 India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Model-driven technologies (MD*), considered beneficial through abstraction and automation, have not enjoyed widespread adoption in the industry. In keeping with the recent trends, using AI techniques might help the benefits of MD* outweigh their costs. Although the modeling community has started using AI techniques, it is, in our opinion, quite limited and requires a change in perspective. We provide such a perspective through five industrial case studies where we use AI techniques in different modeling activities. We discuss our experiences and lessons learned, in some cases evolving purely modeling solutions with AI techniques, and in others considering the AI aids from the beginning. We believe that these case studies can help the researchers and practitioners make sense of various artifacts and data available to them and use applicable AI techniques to enhance suitable modeling activities.

Indexed as

AI-drivenDomain modelingInformation extractionKnowledge graphsNatural language processing

Identifiers

PMID35221860
PMCPMC8857636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.