Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35221770›Full record

ArticleEducation and information technologies2022

Accelerated HE digitalisation: Exploring staff and student experiences of the COVID-19 rapid online-learning transfer.

Laura Louise Nicklin, Luke Wilsdon, Darren Chadwick, Laura Rhoden, David Ormerod, Deborah Allen, Gemma Witton, Joanne Lloyd

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Education and information technologies, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laura Louise NicklinInstitute of Education, Faculty of Education, Health and Wellbeing, University of Wolverhampton, Walsall, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6195-9501
Luke WilsdonDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Education, Health and Wellbeing, University of Wolverhampton, WV1 1LY Wolverhampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8268-3199
Darren ChadwickDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Education, Health and Wellbeing, University of Wolverhampton, WV1 1LY Wolverhampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4963-0973
Laura RhodenDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Education, Health and Wellbeing, University of Wolverhampton, WV1 1LY Wolverhampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7269-3032
David OrmerodDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Education, Health and Wellbeing, University of Wolverhampton, WV1 1LY Wolverhampton, UK.
Deborah AllenDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Education, Health and Wellbeing, University of Wolverhampton, WV1 1LY Wolverhampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7970-462X
Gemma WittonCollege of Learning and Teaching, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2488-0412
Joanne LloydDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Education, Health and Wellbeing, University of Wolverhampton, WV1 1LY Wolverhampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3891-7247
University of Wolverhampton · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the UK, the first 'lockdown' of the COVID-19 pandemic necessitated a rapid shift to online learning and digital technologies in Higher Education (HE). While the situation was unprecedented, extant literature on online learning suggested there would be challenges, opportunities, and benefits to this transition, and we sought to understand these via a case study of one UK HEI department at this time. To draw out in-depth and nuanced accounts of this (at time of investigation-unstudied) scenario, qualitative data were collected via semi-structured online interview or written reflection. To explore, identify and understand the experiences from both sides, and with a diverse sample, we purposively recruited both staff (n = 10) and students (n = 12), from various roles and backgrounds, including those with additional learning and/or mental health needs. The 'bricolage' data were analysed inductively, utilising a latent reflexive approach, and organised into a framework around five core themes: 'methods and means of engagement'; 'learning maintenance, destruction and construction'; 'remote education and resource accessibility and literacy'; 'support and communication'; and 'life and learning: responses, adaptations and impacts'. Within these, a range of challenges, successes and, most importantly, future learning and innovation outcomes were identified by staff and students, particularly relevant to working with and supporting students with additional needs in the online learning forum. These discoveries informed a set of practical recommendations, provided here in Box 1, for (rapid implementation of) online learning (in times of stress).

Indexed as

COVID-19Education InnovationHigher educationOnline learningQualitativeRapid Transition

Identifiers

PMID35221770
PMCPMC8857631
OpenAlexW4213015966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.