Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35221664›Full record

ArticleGlobal bioethics = Problemi di bioetica2022

Sustainable biobanks: a case study for a green global bioethics.

G Samuel, F Lucivero, A M Lucassen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global bioethics = Problemi di bioetica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

G SamuelClinical Law and Ethics at Southampton (CELS), University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8111-2730
F LuciveroEthox Centre and Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1308-5846
A M LucassenClinical Law and Ethics at Southampton (CELS), University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3324-4338

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper argues that as we move to redefine global bioethics, there is a need to be attentive to the ethical issues associated with the environmental sustainability of data and digital infrastructures in global health systems. We show that these infrastructures have thus far featured little in environmental impact discussions in the context of health, and we use a case study approach of biobanking to illustrate this. We argue that this missing discussion is problematic because biobanks have environmental impacts associated with data and digital infrastructures. We consider several ethical questions to consider these impacts: what ethical work does the concept of environmental sustainability add to the debate; how should this concept be prioritised in decision-making; and who should be responsible for doing so? We call on global bioethics to play a role in advancing this dialogue and addressing these questions.

Indexed as

biobankingbioethicsDigital sustainabilityenvironmentalsustainability

Identifiers

PMID35221664
PMCPMC8881066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.