ArticleIndian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2022
Thorax trauma severity score in patient with chest trauma: study at tertiary-level hospital.
Article in Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Clinical prediction models for the management of blunt chest trauma in the emergency department: a systematic review.BMC emergency medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Fast, accurate, and cost-effective: E-FAST's breakthrough in optimizing thoracic trauma management.Turkish journal of surgery · 2026Article
- Utility of the Thoracic Trauma Severity Score in Predicting Outcomes in Isolated Thoracic Injuries:Sultan Qaboos University medical journal · 2026Observational
- Comparison of the Thoracic Trauma Severity Score (TTSS) and Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) in predicting clinical outcomes in chest trauma patients: protocol for a prospective cohort study from Iraq.International journal of surgery protocols · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThoracic trauma accounts for 20-25% of all trauma-related mortalities and the majority of these deaths occur within few hours of hospitalization. Therefore, prompt diagnosis, assessment of the severity of chest trauma, and immediate treatment are essential to prevent morbidity and mortality. The thorax trauma severity score (TTSS) can be calculated in the emergency room with ease. However, the validity of the TTSS score has still not been evaluated in the Indian setting. This study was conducted with the objective to assess the prognostic role of TTSS to predict the patient's outcome with thoracic trauma.
methodA prospective observational cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Surgery, Shri Vasantrao Naik Government Medical College, Yavatmal, India, from 1st March 2018 to 31st December 2019. A total of 284 patients, primarily admitted for chest trauma, were included in the study. TTSS was used to assess the severity of the trauma; the outcome (non-hospitalized survivors, hospitalized survivors, and hospitalized non-survivors) was recorded along with the patient's data and the scoring system. Patients were grouped as per a TTSS score range. Group I includes patients with a TTSS score of 0-5 points, group II patients with a TTSS score of 6-10, group III patients with a TTSS score of 11-15, group IV patients with a TTTS score of 16-20, and group V patients with a TTSS score of 21-25. Fisher's exact test was used to compare qualitative data. To evaluate the statistical significance of sensitivity and specificity and to choose suitable cut-off points to make decisions, the receiver operator curve (ROC) was used.
resultsThe present study included 239 male (84.2%) and 45 female patients (15.8%) with a mean age of 41.57 with a standard deviation of ± 16 years. Sixty-seven (3.9%) patients were non-hospitalized survivors, 202 (71.1%) patients were hospitalized survivors, and 15 (5.3%) patients were hospitalized non-survivors. Two hundred and nineteen (77.1%) patients required conservative management, 49 (17.3%) had unilateral closed thoracostomy, and 11 (3.9%) patients required bilateral thoracostomy. Thoracotomy was required in 3 patients. No mortality was seen in groups I, II, and III. All the 9 patients with TTSS score 21-25 points had fatal prognoses. A TTSS score of 7.5 and above was associated with increased morbidity and mortality in patients with thoracic injuries.
conclusionThe outcome of thoracic trauma patients can be predicted by using the TTSS. A score of 7.5 and above was associated with morbidity and a score of 20 and above predicted the fatal prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.