Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35221525›Full record

ArticleReading and writing2022

Concurrent predictors of word reading and reading comprehension for 9-year-olds with Williams syndrome.

Carolyn B Mervis, Caroline Greiner de Magalhães, Cláudia Cardoso-Martins

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reading and writing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Spelling abilities of school-aged children with Williams syndrome.Research in developmental disabilities · 2022
    Article
  4. Williams syndrome.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2021
    Review
  5. [Early motor development in children with Williams syndrome].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Carolyn B MervisDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Louisville, 317 Life Sciences Building, Louisville, KY 40292 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4206-6115
Caroline Greiner de MagalhãesDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Louisville, 317 Life Sciences Building, Louisville, KY 40292 USA.
Cláudia Cardoso-MartinsDepartment of Psychology, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7589-7997
University of Louisville · USUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BR

Funding

GENOTYPE/PHENOTYPE CORRELATIONS IN WILLIAMS SYNDROMER01NS035102 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI MERVIS, CAROLYN B. · 1996 to 2009
$12.5M
Early Development with Williams or Down SyndromeR37HD029957 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI MERVIS, CAROLYN B. · 2004 to 2013
$3.4M
NICHD NIH HHS R37 HD029957NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS035102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examined the cognitive, language, and instructional factors associated with reading ability in Williams syndrome (WS). Seventy 9-year-olds with WS completed standardized measures of real-word reading, pseudoword decoding, reading comprehension, phonological skills, listening comprehension, nonverbal reasoning, visual-spatial ability, verbal working memory, rapid naming, and vocabulary. Reading instruction method was determined from school records and interviews with parents and teachers. Similar to prior findings for individuals with WS, reading ability varied widely, ranging from inability to read any words to reading comprehension at age level. Multiple regression analyses indicated that the primary concurrent predictor of word reading ability was reading instruction method, with a systematic phonics approach associated with considerably better performance than other reading instruction approaches. Phonological processing skills-as assessed by a composite of phonological awareness and verbal short-term memory-also contributed significant unique variance to word reading ability, as did visual-spatial ability. The concurrent predictors of reading comprehension were single-word reading and listening comprehension. These findings indicate that the factors that predict concurrent early word reading and reading comprehension abilities for children with WS are consistent with previous findings for typically developing children and that the Simple View of Reading applies to children with WS. Children with WS benefit strongly from systematic phonics instruction regardless of IQ. Instruction focused on improving listening comprehension is likely to improve reading comprehension, especially as word reading skills increase. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11145-021-10163-4.

Indexed as

Intellectual disabilityPhonological skillsReading comprehensionReading instruction methodWilliams syndromeWord reading

Identifiers

PMID35221525
PMCPMC8827302
OpenAlexW3198558676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.