ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2022
Assessment of dual-tasking during a dynamic balance task using a smartphone app: a pilot study.
Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dual-tasking interference is exacerbated outdoors: A pilot study.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[Purpose] To assess if the instrumented Timed Up and Go (iTUG) task score calculated with an iPhone application can detect gait changes under dual-tasking conditions. [Participants and Methods] Twenty participants (age 38.30 ± 12.54, 12 females) were asked to complete the TUG as a single task and under two dual-tasking conditions: 1) verbal fluency and 2) mental calculation. We used a smartphone, stopwatch, digital camera, and wearable sensor to calculate the dependent variables which included time, step count, gait speed, and iTUG score and, the dual-tasking cost (DTC) of those variables. We used Friedman analyses of variance and Wilcoxon tests for statistical analyses. [Results] the iTUG score, step count, gait speed, and the time measured by the stopwatch and wearable sensor differed significantly for all tasks, but the smartphone time did not. [Conclusion] We conclude that the iTUG score could be used as a sensitive measure for identifying gait changes under dual-tasking conditions. With the growing demands of telehealth, using technology as an objective tool for movement analysis is needed for clinicians and payers. Our findings demonstrate the potential value of the iTUG score to assess and track patient's progress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.