ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2022
Intra- and inter-examiner reliability and minimal detectable change for different methods of measuring toe grip strength in healthy adults.
Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Relationship between toe grip strength and dynamic balance in older adult patients with femoral neck fracture.Journal of physical therapy science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[Purpose] This study aimed to compare the inter- and intra-examiner reliabilities of toe grip strength measurements obtained just above the first interphalangeal joint with those of toe grip strength measurements obtained in the most comfortable position for the participant. The study also aimed to calculate the minimal detectable change for the more reliable method. [Participants and Methods] The participants for each test included 20 healthy adult males and females. Intra-class correlation coefficient (1,1) and (2,1) values were calculated for both tests. Bland-Altman analysis was used to determine the systematic error and calculate the minimal detectable change. [Results] The intra- and inter-examiner reliabilities of measurements obtained by setting the position of the toe-grasping bar to the first interphalangeal joint were better than those obtained in the most comfortable position for the participant. Measurement of the minimal detectable change showed a random error of 4.97 kg. [Conclusion] We considered that toe grip strength measurements just above the first interphalangeal joint were better. The minimal detectable change was 4.97 in healthy adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.