Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35221356›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2021

Regional anaesthesia practices in India: A nationwide survey.

Srinivasan Ramachandran, Naveen Malhotra, Savitri Velayudhan, Sukhminder Jit Singh Bajwa, Muralidhar Joshi, Lalit Mehdiratta, Vishwanath R Hiremath

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Application of Regional Anaesthesia in Türkiye: National Survey Study.Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation · 2025
    Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Srinivasan RamachandranDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Sri Manakula Vinayagar Medical College and Hospital, Puducherry, India.
Naveen MalhotraDepartment of Cardiac Anaesthesia and Pain Management Centre, PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana, India.
Savitri VelayudhanDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Indira Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Puducherry, India.
Sukhminder Jit Singh BajwaDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Gian Sagar Medical College and Hospital, Patiala, Punjab, India.
Muralidhar JoshiDepartment of Anaesthesia, Virinchi Hospitals, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Lalit MehdirattaDepartment of Trauma ICU and OT, Narmada Group of Hospitals, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Vishwanath R HiremathDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Sree Lakshmi Narayana Institute of Medical Sciences, Puducherry, India.
Gian Sagar Medical College and Hospital · INIndira Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute · INNarayana Health · INPandit Bhagwat Dayal Sharma Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences · INSri Manakula Vinayagar Medical College and Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsThere are no surveys documenting the existing regional anaesthesia (RA) practices in our country. This nationwide survey aims to record the existing RA practices, identify any lacunae that might exist and project the future direction of evolution.

methodsThis online survey consisting of 31 questions was sent to all members of the Indian Society of Anaesthesiologists and addressed participants' demographic features, central neuraxial block and peripheral nerve block practices, drug selection, RA training and safety measures. The data were analysed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 24.0. All categorical variables were expressed as frequencies and percentages.

resultsA total of 2141 responses were received, with participants distributed across the country. Forty-two per cent of the respondents reported that more than 60% of surgeries were performed under RA. Most of the participants use 'traditional' test dose for epidural space confirmation. Fifty participants (2.4%) use ultrasound for neuraxial space identification. Twenty per cent of the participants use a checklist for monitoring post-operative epidural analgesia. 6.7% have undergone specialised training in RA. Around 3.5% of the respondents have performed a wrong-side block. 31.4% of the respondents store intralipid in the operating room.

conclusionThe current survey highlights the prevailing practices, various deficiencies in monitoring and the need for RA training programmes. The data accrued can serve as a baseline for future comparison.

Indexed as

Anaestheticsanalgesiaepiduralsurveys and questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID35221356
PMCPMC8820327
OpenAlexW4205101924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.