Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35221154›Full record

ArticleZeitschrift fur medizinische Physik2022

3D printed patient-specific thorax phantom with realistic heterogenous bone radiopacity using filament printer technology.

Sepideh Hatamikia, Gernot Kronreif, Alexander Unger, Gunpreet Oberoi, Laszlo Jaksa, Ewald Unger, Stefan Koschitz, Ingo Gulyas, Nikolaus Irnstorfer, Martin Buschmann and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sepideh HatamikiaAustrian Center for Medical Innovation and Technology, Wiener Neustadt, Austria; Danube Private University, 3500 Krems an der Donau, Austria; Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. Electronic address: sepideh.hatamikia@acmit.at.
Gernot KronreifAustrian Center for Medical Innovation and Technology, Wiener Neustadt, Austria.
Alexander UngerAustrian Center for Medical Innovation and Technology, Wiener Neustadt, Austria.
Gunpreet OberoiCenter for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Laszlo JaksaAustrian Center for Medical Innovation and Technology, Wiener Neustadt, Austria.
Ewald UngerCenter for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Stefan KoschitzAustrian Center for Medical Innovation and Technology, Wiener Neustadt, Austria.
Ingo GulyasDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Nikolaus IrnstorferDivision of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy at the Medical University of Vienna.
Martin BuschmannDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Joachim KettenbachInstitute of Diagnostic, Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Landesklinikum Wiener Neustadt, Wiener Neustadt, Austria.
Wolfgang BirkfellnerCenter for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Andrea LorenzAustrian Center for Medical Innovation and Technology, Wiener Neustadt, Austria.
Medical University of Vienna · ATAustrian Center for Medical Innovation and Technology · ATDanube Private University · ATFachhochschule Wiener Neustadt · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current medical imaging phantoms are usually limited by simplified geometry and radiographic skeletal homogeneity, which confines their usage for image quality assessment. In order to fabricate realistic imaging phantoms, replication of the entire tissue morphology and the associated CT numbers, defined as Hounsfield Unit (HU) is required. 3D printing is a promising technology for the production of medical imaging phantoms with accurate anatomical replication. So far, the majority of the imaging phantoms using 3D printing technologies tried to mimic the average HU of soft tissue human organs. One important aspect of the anthropomorphic imaging phantoms is also the replication of realistic radiodensities for bone tissues. In this study, we used filament printing technology to develop a CT-derived 3D printed thorax phantom with realistic bone-equivalent radiodensity using only one single commercially available filament. The generated thorax phantom geometry closely resembles a patient and includes direct manufacturing of bone structures while creating life-like heterogeneity within bone tissues. A HU analysis as well as a physical dimensional comparison were performed in order to evaluate the density and geometry agreement between the proposed phantom and the corresponding CT data. With the achieved density range (-482 to 968 HU) we could successfully mimic the realistic radiodensity of the bone marrow as well as the cortical bone for the ribs, vertebral body and dorsal vertebral column in the thorax skeleton. In addition, considering the large radiodensity range achieved a full thorax imaging phantom mimicking also soft tissues can become feasible. The physical dimensional comparison using both Extrema Analysis and Collision Detection methods confirmed a mean surface overlap of 90% and a mean volumetric overlap of 84,56% between the patient and phantom model. Furthermore, the reproducibility analyses revealed a good geometry and radiodensity duplicability in 24 printed cylinder replicas. Thus, according to our results, the proposed additively manufactured anthropomorphic thorax phantom has the potential to be efficiently used for validation of imaging- and radiation-based procedures in precision medicine.

Indexed as

ThoraxTomography, X-Ray ComputedBone and BonesHumansPhantoms, ImagingPrinting, Three-DimensionalReproducibility of Results3D printingFilament printer technologyHeterogenous bone radiopacityImaging phantomPatient-specific thorax phantom

Identifiers

PMID35221154
PMCPMC9948829
OpenAlexW4213455437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.