ReviewPhilosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM2022
The "One Health" approach in the face of Covid-19: how radical should it be?
Review in Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Ethical Challenges and Opportunities at the Intersection of One Health and Open Science in India: A Scoping Review.Open research Europe · 2025Pooled it
- Defining One Health: Environment versus ecosystem.CABI one health · 2026Article
- One Health implementation in Ghana: a perspective on policy development and institutional change.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Historical review of the Indonesian government's response to health crisis: From the Spanish flu to the COVID-19 pandemic.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025Article
- Emergence of COVID-19's JN.1 Subvariant Sparks Outbreak in India.Infectious disorders drug targets · 2025Article
- A One Health call to re examine medical practice: going beyond strong anthropocentrism.Science in One Health · 2025Review
- A minimal One Health approach? Lessons from the salmon aquaculture crisis in Chile.Global bioethics = Problemi di bioetica · 2025Article
- Improving the ONE HEALTH approach: a lesson from SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2024Review
- Uncovering associations between interest in One Health and pre-existing conditions and behaviours: Evidence from a UK survey.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024Article
- One Health governance: theory, practice and ethics.Science in One Health · 2024Review
- What Do We Know About the Smallpox Virus? A Journey Between Clinic and Therapy.Pharmaceutical research · 2023Article
- Pharmacological Agents with Antiviral Activity against Monkeypox Infection.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Article
- From human-centric digital health to digital One Health: Crucial new directions for mutual flourishing.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe 2020-2021 coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic is just the latest epidemic event that requires us to rethink and change our understanding of health. Health should no longer be conceived only in relation to human beings, but in unitary terms, as a dimension that connects humans, animals, plants, and the environment (holistic view, One Health). In general, alterations occurring in this articulated chain of life trigger a domino effect. METHODOLOGY: In this paper, we review the One Health paradigm in the light of the Covid-19 pandemic and distinguish two approaches within it that might be dubbed the Prudent one and the Radical one. Each approach is structured in three levels - epistemological, medical, and ethical.
resultsIn this way, we show how we humans can better address the pandemic today and how, in the future, we can treat the whole living system better, by renouncing our anthropocentric perspective on health.
conclusionWe hold that the Prudent approach can be very helpful, and we discuss the medical and ethical issues related to it. We also consider the Radical view and the epistemological turn it requires compared to the Prudent one.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.