Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35220692›Full record

SynthesisClinical and experimental dental research2022

Push-out bond strength of the calcium silicate-based endodontic cements in the presence of blood: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies.

Mahdieh Alipour, Leili Faraji Gavgani, Negin Ghasemi

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical and experimental dental research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Repair of furcal perforations using different calcium silicate cements: AnJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mahdieh AlipourDental and Periodontal Research Center, Faculty of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-9717-8213
Leili Faraji GavganiDepartment of Statistics and Epidemiology, Faculty of Health, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Negin GhasemiDental and Periodontal Research Center, Faculty of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-1184-3436
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe push-out bond strength (POBS) of calcium silicate-based cements (CSCs) to the dentinal wall is considered one of the essential physical properties for clinical success. The presence of blood in the treatment area affects the POBS of these types of cement. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of blood contamination on the bond strength of CSCs and dentinal walls. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis systematic review was performed by searching electronic databases (MEDLINE-PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE) to include relevant in vitro studies published between 1992 and April 2020. Two reviewers independently evaluated the selected studies and extracted data on the type of studied CSCs, evaluated area of the teeth, sample size, the dimension of a prepared area, slice thickness, storage duration, the setting of the universal testing machine (UTM), effects of blood contamination on POBS of CSCs and their failure modes. The bond strength of evaluated CSCs in studies was used for network meta-analysis.

resultsInitial searches identified 292 articles, while only 13 articles met the inclusion criteria. Full texts of these articles were evaluated, and data extraction was performed. The effect of blood contamination on bond strength to the dentinal wall was assessed in various CSCs such as PMTA, Biodentine, and AMTA. The network meta-analysis results showed that the bond strength of Biodentine was significantly higher than other types of cement in blood presence (p < .05).

conclusionsBased on the current systematic review, despite controversies among the result of the different articles and the lack of data for some CSCs like bioaggregate, it could be concluded that the bond strength of Biodentine to the dentinal wall is better than other evaluated CSCs in the presence of blood.

Indexed as

Dental BondingCalcium CompoundsDental CementsSilicatesCalcium Compoundscalcium silicateDental CementsSilicatesblood contaminationcalcium silicate-based cementmeta-analysismineral trioxide aggregate (MTA)push-out bond strengthsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID35220692
PMCPMC9033536
OpenAlexW4214593984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.