Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35220520›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental science and pollution research international2022

Metals extraction processes from electronic waste: constraints and opportunities.

Shovra Chandra Chakraborty, Md Wahad Uz Zaman, Mozammel Hoque, Md Qamruzzaman, Jahid Uz Zaman, Delowar Hossain, Biplob Kumar Pramanik, Luong Ngoc Nguyen, Long Duc Nghiem, Md Mofijur and 5 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Shovra Chandra Chakraborty *Department of Applied Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi, 6205, Bangladesh.
Md Wahad Uz Zaman *Department of Applied Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi, 6205, Bangladesh.
Mozammel Hoque *Department of Applied Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi, 6205, Bangladesh.
Md Qamruzzaman *Department of Applied Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi, 6205, Bangladesh.
Jahid Uz ZamanDepartment of Applied Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi, 6205, Bangladesh.
Delowar HossainDepartment of Applied Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi, 6205, Bangladesh.
Biplob Kumar PramanikSchool of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
Luong Ngoc NguyenCentre for Technology in Water and Wastewater, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Technology Sydney, 15, Broadway, Sydney, NSW, 2007, Australia.
Long Duc NghiemCentre for Technology in Water and Wastewater, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Technology Sydney, 15, Broadway, Sydney, NSW, 2007, Australia.
Md MofijurCentre for Technology in Water and Wastewater, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Technology Sydney, 15, Broadway, Sydney, NSW, 2007, Australia.
Md Ibrahim H MondalDepartment of Applied Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi, 6205, Bangladesh.
Jeni Aprazita SithiDepartment of Applied Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi, 6205, Bangladesh.
Sha Md Shahan ShahriarDepartment of Applied Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi, 6205, Bangladesh.
Md Abu Hasan JohirCentre for Technology in Water and Wastewater, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Technology Sydney, 15, Broadway, Sydney, NSW, 2007, Australia. Mohammed.Johir@uts.edu.au.
Mohammad Boshir AhmedDepartment of Applied Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi, 6205, Bangladesh. Mohammad.Ahmed@gist.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The skyrocketing demand and progressive technology have increased our dependency on electrical and electronic devices. However, the life span of these devices has been shortened because of rapid scientific expansions. Hence, massive volumes of electronic waste (e-waste) is generating day by day. Nevertheless, the ongoing management of e-waste has emerged as a major threat to sustainable economic development worldwide. In general, e-waste contains several toxic substances such as metals, plastics, and refractory oxides. Metals, particularly lead, mercury, nickel, cadmium, and copper along with some valuable metals such as rare earth metals, platinum group elements, alkaline and radioactive metal are very common; which can be extracted before disposing of the e-waste for reuse. In addition, many of these metals are hazardous. Therefore, e-waste management is an essential issue. In this study, we critically have reviewed the existing extraction processes and compared among different processes such as physical, biological, supercritical fluid technologies, pyro and hydrometallurgical, and hybrid methods used for metals extraction from e-waste. The review indicates that although each method has particular merits but hybrid methods are eco-friendlier with extraction efficiency > 90%. This study also provides insight into the technical challenges to the practical realization of metals extraction from e-waste sources.

Indexed as

Electronic WasteWaste ManagementMetalsPlasticsRecyclingMetalsPlasticsChallengesEnvironmental pollutionE-wasteExtractionMetals

Identifiers

PMID35220520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.