Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35220469›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2022

E-scooter driving under the acute influence of alcohol-a real-driving fitness study.

Katharina Zube, Thomas Daldrup, Michael Lau, Rüdiger Maatz, Anne Tank, Irina Steiner, Holger Schwender, Benno Hartung

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Interpol review of forensic toxicology, 2023-2025.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The "Mellanby effect" in alcoholised e-scooter drivers.International journal of legal medicine · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Katharina ZubeInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Thomas DaldrupInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Michael LauInstitute of Mathematics, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Rüdiger MaatzFederal Court of Justice, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Anne TankInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Irina SteinerInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Holger SchwenderInstitute of Mathematics, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Benno HartungInstitute of Legal Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany. benno.hartung@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEDüsseldorf University Hospital · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the effects of alcohol on the ability to drive an e-scooter, driving tests reflecting real-life situations accompanied by medical examinations focusing on balance were conducted at different blood alcohol concentrations (BACs).

methodsFifty-seven subjects who consumed alcohol (28 female, 29 male) and 6 consistently sober subjects (3 female, 3 male) participated in the study. Alcohol was administered on a fixed schedule, and the individual drinking quantity was individually calculated in advance using the Widmark formula. Repeated runs through a fixed course were performed. Following each ride, a blood sample was taken for BAC determination, and medical tests were performed.

resultsEven at low BACs (0.21-0.60 g/kg), subjects showed a significant decrease in driving performance, to approximately 60% of the initial level. Differences in driving performance at different BAC ranges were observed for different obstacles, especially for the narrowing track, gate passage, slalom, and driving in circles obstacles. Furthermore, worse Romberg and Unterberger test results were correlated with worse driving performance. It cannot be assumed that learning effects during the study had a relevant effect, as shown in the comparison of the driving performance of the alcohol-consuming group with that of the control group. Sex-specific differences were not found. DISCUSSION: Significant deteriorations in driving performance at BACs below 1.10 g/kg confirmed alcohol-related risk potential when using e-scooters. At this time, these findings may lead to the assumption of "relative driving impairment" in Germany. The Romberg and Unterberger tests could be considered a complementary investigation method for the assessment of e-scooter driving impairment.

conclusionEven at rather low BACs between 0.21 and 0.40 g/kg, there was a significant deterioration in driving performance under the influence of alcohol compared to sober, which highlights the negative effects of alcohol on e-scooter driving.

Indexed as

Automobile DrivingDriving Under the InfluenceAlcohol DrinkingBlood Alcohol ContentEthanolFemaleGermanyHumansMaleBlood Alcohol ContentEthanolAlcoholDriving under the influenceE-scooterImpairmentNeurological examination

Identifiers

PMID35220469
PMCPMC9375743
OpenAlexW4214482744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.