Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35220045›Full record

ArticleNeoplasia (New York, N.Y.)2022

Noninvasive optoacoustic microangiography reveals dose and size dependency of radiation-induced deep tumor vasculature remodeling.

Anna Orlova, Ksenia Pavlova, Aleksey Kurnikov, Anna Maslennikova, Marina Myagcheva, Evgeniy Zakharov, Dmitry Skamnitskiy, Valeria Perekatova, Alexander Khilov, Andrey Kovalchuk and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Early Radiation Therapy Response Assessment Using Multi-Scale Photoacoustic Imaging.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Correlation of PreclinicalIn vivo (Athens, Greece)
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Anna OrlovaDivision of Nonlinear Dynamics and Optics, Institute of Applied Physics of Russian Academy of Sciences, 46 Ul'yanov Street, Nizhny Novgorod 603950, Russia. Electronic address: ag.orlova@mail.ru.
Ksenia PavlovaDivision of Nonlinear Dynamics and Optics, Institute of Applied Physics of Russian Academy of Sciences, 46 Ul'yanov Street, Nizhny Novgorod 603950, Russia; Department of Biophysics, Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia.
Aleksey KurnikovDivision of Nonlinear Dynamics and Optics, Institute of Applied Physics of Russian Academy of Sciences, 46 Ul'yanov Street, Nizhny Novgorod 603950, Russia.
Anna MaslennikovaDivision of Nonlinear Dynamics and Optics, Institute of Applied Physics of Russian Academy of Sciences, 46 Ul'yanov Street, Nizhny Novgorod 603950, Russia; Department of Biophysics, Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia; Department of Oncology, Radiation Therapy and Radiology, Privolzhsky Medical Research University, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia.
Marina MyagchevaPathology Department, Nizhny Novgorod Regional Children's Clinical Hospital, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia.
Evgeniy ZakharovPathology Department, Nizhny Novgorod Regional Children's Clinical Hospital, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia.
Dmitry SkamnitskiyRadiotherapy Department, Nizhny Novgorod Regional Oncology Hospital, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia.
Valeria PerekatovaDivision of Nonlinear Dynamics and Optics, Institute of Applied Physics of Russian Academy of Sciences, 46 Ul'yanov Street, Nizhny Novgorod 603950, Russia.
Alexander KhilovDivision of Nonlinear Dynamics and Optics, Institute of Applied Physics of Russian Academy of Sciences, 46 Ul'yanov Street, Nizhny Novgorod 603950, Russia.
Andrey KovalchukDivision of Nonlinear Dynamics and Optics, Institute of Applied Physics of Russian Academy of Sciences, 46 Ul'yanov Street, Nizhny Novgorod 603950, Russia.
Alexander MoiseevDivision of Nonlinear Dynamics and Optics, Institute of Applied Physics of Russian Academy of Sciences, 46 Ul'yanov Street, Nizhny Novgorod 603950, Russia.
Ilya TurchinDivision of Nonlinear Dynamics and Optics, Institute of Applied Physics of Russian Academy of Sciences, 46 Ul'yanov Street, Nizhny Novgorod 603950, Russia.
Daniel RazanskyInstitute for Biomedical Engineering and Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, Institute for Biomedical Engineering, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. Electronic address: daniel.razansky@uzh.ch.
Pavel SubochevDivision of Nonlinear Dynamics and Optics, Institute of Applied Physics of Russian Academy of Sciences, 46 Ul'yanov Street, Nizhny Novgorod 603950, Russia.
Institute of Applied Physics · RUNizhny Novgorod Regional Clinical Oncology Center · RUPrivolzhsky Research Medical University · RUUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor microvascular responses may provide a sensitive readout indicative of radiation therapy efficacy, its time course and dose dependencies. However, direct high-resolution observation and longitudinal monitoring of large-scale microvascular remodeling in deep tissues remained challenging with the conventional microscopy approaches. We report on a non-invasive longitudinal study of morphological and functional neovascular responses by means of scanning optoacoustic (ОА) microangiography. In vivo imaging of CT26 tumor response to a single irradiation at varying dose (6, 12, and 18 Gy) has been performed over ten days following treatment. Tumor oxygenation levels were further estimated using diffuse optical spectroscopy (DOS) with a contact fiber probe. OA revealed the formation of extended vascular structures on the whole tumor scale during its proliferation, whereas only short fragmented vascular regions were identified following irradiation. On the first day post treatment, a decrease in the density of small (capillary-sized) and medium-sized vessels was revealed, accompanied by an increase in their fragmentation. Larger vessels exhibited an increase in their density accompanied by a decline in the number of vascular segments. Short-lasting response has been observed after 6 and 12 Gy irradiations, whereas 18 Gy treatment resulted in prolonged responses, up to the tenth day after irradiation. DOS measurements further revealed a delayed increase of tumor oxygenation levels for 18 Gy irradiations, commencing on the sixth day post treatment. The ameliorated oxygenation is attributed to diminished oxygen consumption by inhibited tumor cells but not to the elevation of oxygen supply. This work is the first to demonstrate the differential (size-dependent) nature of vascular responses to radiation treatments at varying doses in vivo. The OA approach thus facilitates the study of radiation-induced vascular changes in an unperturbed in vivo environment while enabling deep tissue high-resolution observations at the whole tumor scale.

Indexed as

Oxygen ConsumptionHumansLongitudinal StudiesMicrovascular remodelingOptoacoustic angiographyRadiation therapySize-dependent vascular responseTumor models

Identifiers

PMID35220045
PMCPMC8889238
OpenAlexW4214525130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.