Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35219922›Full record

ArticleBrain stimulation

Cell type-specific excitability probed by optogenetic stimulation depends on the phase of the alpha oscillation.

Mengsen Zhang, Flavio Frohlich

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain stimulation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Designing Neural Dynamics: From Digital Twin Modeling to Regeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Optogenetic Mapping of Rhythmic Phase-Dependent Excitability in the Mouse Striatum.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mengsen ZhangDepartment of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Flavio FrohlichDepartment of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Carolina Center for Neurostimulation, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Neuroscience Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Neurology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. Electronic address: flavio_frohlich@med.unc.edu.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Causal investigation of the functional interactions of theta and alpha neural oscillations in output-gatingR01MH124387 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI FROHLICH, FLAVIO · 2021 to 2025
$3.4M
Rational Optimization of tACS for Targeting Thalamo-Cortical OscillationsR01MH111889 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI FROHLICH, FLAVIO · 2016 to 2019
$2.4M
Targeted circuit modulation to delineate the causal role of oscillatory interactions in top-down networks of cognitive controlR01MH122477 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI FROHLICH, FLAVIO · 2020 to 2024
$1.9M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH111889NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH122477NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH124387
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlpha oscillations have been proposed to provide phasic inhibition in the brain. Yet, pinging alpha oscillations with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to examine phase-dependent network excitability has resulted in conflicting findings. At the cellular level, such gating by the alpha oscillation remains poorly understood.

objectiveWe examine how the excitability of pyramidal cells and presumed fast-spiking inhibitory interneurons depends on the phase of the alpha oscillation.

methodsOptogenetic stimulation pulses were administered at random phases of the alpha oscillation in the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) of two adult ferrets that expressed channelrhodopsin in pyramidal cells. Post-stimulation firing probability was calculated as a function of the stimulation phase of the alpha oscillation for both verum and sham stimulation.

resultsThe excitability of pyramidal cells depended on the alpha phase, in anticorrelation with their intrinsic phase preference; pyramidal cells were more responsive to optogenetic stimulation at the alpha phase with intrinsically low firing rates. In contrast, presumed fast-spiking inhibitory interneurons did not show such a phase dependency despite their stronger intrinsic phase preference.

conclusionsAlpha oscillations gate input to PPC in a phase-dependent manner such that low intrinsic activity was associated with higher responsiveness to input. This finding supports a model of cortical oscillation, in which internal processing and communication are limited to the depolarized half-cycle, whereas the other half-cycle serves as a signal detector for unexpected input. The functional role of different parts of the alpha cycle may vary across the cortex depending on local neuronal firing properties.

Indexed as

FerretsOptogeneticsAnimalsInterneuronsPyramidal CellsTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAlpha oscillationsExcitabilityGatingOptogeneticsPhaseSynchronization

Identifiers

PMID35219922
PMCPMC8975618
OpenAlexW4214653778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.