Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35219302›Full record

Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2022

Analgesic effects of different concentrations of ropivacaine in transversalis fascia plane block during laparotomy.

Ye Tian, Yong Zhan, Ke Liu, Shaojin Bu, Yalin Tian, Chunyan Xiong, Jintao Shen

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Safety of pre-incisional low-dose ropivacaine infiltration in bilateral axillo-breast approach thyroidectomy: a retrospective study.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ye TianDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pangang Group General Hospital, Panzhihua, Sichuan, China.
Yong ZhanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Fengdu People's Hospital, No. 33, Lutang Street, Sanhe Street, 408200, Fengdu County, Chongqing, China.
Ke LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Fengdu People's Hospital, No. 33, Lutang Street, Sanhe Street, 408200, Fengdu County, Chongqing, China. ke41987158637306@126.com.
Shaojin BuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Fengdu People's Hospital, No. 33, Lutang Street, Sanhe Street, 408200, Fengdu County, Chongqing, China.
Yalin TianDepartment of Anesthesiology, Fengdu People's Hospital, No. 33, Lutang Street, Sanhe Street, 408200, Fengdu County, Chongqing, China.
Chunyan XiongDepartment of Anesthesiology, Fengdu People's Hospital, No. 33, Lutang Street, Sanhe Street, 408200, Fengdu County, Chongqing, China.
Jintao ShenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Fengdu People's Hospital, No. 33, Lutang Street, Sanhe Street, 408200, Fengdu County, Chongqing, China.
Panzhihua Central Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore the analgesic effects of different concentrations of ropivacaine in transversalis fascia plane (TFP) block during laparotomy.

methodsNinety patients who underwent laparotomy admitted to our hospital from March 2019 to March 2020 were selected as the study subjects and were divided equally into a low concentration group, a medium concentration group, and a high concentration group according to the randomized grouping method. The low concentration group adopted 0.4% ropivacaine 40 ml, the medium concentration group was given 0.5% ropivacaine 40 ml, and the high concentration group was given 0.6% ropivacaine 40 ml. The hemodynamic indexes and the incidence of adverse reactions in the two groups were compared. The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) was used to assess the postoperative pain in the three groups, the Bruggrmann comfort scale (BCS) was used to assess the comfort level in the three groups, and the Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) was used to evaluate the postoperative cognitive function of the three groups of patients.

resultsThe mean artery pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) levels at T1 and T2 were significantly lower in the medium concentration group than in the other two groups (P < 0.05). The low concentration group had a significantly higher NRS score at T2 than the medium concentration group and the high concentration group (P < 0.05). A significantly higher BCS score was observed in the high concentration group than the other two groups (P < 0.05). There were significantly higher Ramsay scores and MMSE scores in the medium concentration group than in the low concentration and high concentration groups (P < 0.05). The overall incidence of adverse reactions of the high concentration group was significantly higher than that of the low concentration group (P < 0.05), but showed similar results with the medium concentration group.

conclusionThe medium concentration group exhibits a better analgesic effect than the low concentration group and higher safety than the high concentration group. Therefore, the use of medium concentration ropivacaine in TFP block may provide a referential basis for clinical treatment.

Indexed as

Nerve BlockRopivacaineAnalgesicsFasciaHumansLaparotomyAnalgesicsRopivacaineDifferent concentrationsLaparotomyRopivacaineTransversalis fascia plane block

Identifiers

PMID35219302
PMCPMC8881832
OpenAlexW4214685746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.