Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35219050›Full record

ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2022

The longitudinal effect of COVID-19 infections and lockdown on mental health and the protective effect of neighbourhood social relations.

James O'Donnell, Diana Cárdenas, Nima Orazani, Ann Evans, Katherine J Reynolds

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. How does social capital shape trajectories of adolescent self-rated health in the United Kingdom?Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Social Cohesion and COVID-19: Integrative Review.Interactive journal of medical research · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

James O'DonnellSchool of Demography, Australian National University, 146 Ellery Crescent, Acton ACT 260, Australia. Electronic address: james.odonnell@anu.edu.au.
Diana CárdenasResearch School of Psychology, Australian National University, Building 39, Science Road, Acton ACT 2601, Australia. Electronic address: diana.cardenas@anu.edu.au.
Nima OrazaniResearch School of Psychology, Australian National University, Building 39, Science Road, Acton ACT 2601, Australia. Electronic address: s.nima.orazani@gmail.com.
Ann EvansSchool of Demography, Australian National University, 146 Ellery Crescent, Acton ACT 260, Australia. Electronic address: ann.evans@anu.edu.au.
Katherine J ReynoldsResearch School of Psychology, Australian National University, Building 39, Science Road, Acton ACT 2601, Australia. Electronic address: katherine.reynolds@anu.edu.au.
Australian National University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleThe effect of COVID-19 lockdowns on mental health is a major concern worldwide. Measuring the impacts, however, is difficult because of a lack of data that tracks and compares outcomes and potential protective social factors before and during lockdowns.

objectiveWe aim to quantify the impact of a second lockdown in 2020 in the Australian city of Melbourne on levels of depression, anxiety, and loneliness, and analyse whether social relations in the neighbourhood may buffer against the worst effects of lockdown.

methodsWe draw on quasi-experimental data from a nationally-representative longitudinal survey conducted in Australia. We use a difference-in-difference approach with a number of control variables to estimate changes in mental health among respondents in Melbourne following the imposition of the lockdown. A measure of perceived neighbourhood social relations is included as an explanatory variable to analyse potential protective effects.

resultsLockdown is estimated to have increased depressive symptoms by approximately 23% and feelings of loneliness by 4%. No effect on anxiety was detected. Levels of neighbourhood social relations were strongly negatively associated with mental health symptoms. A significant interaction between lockdown and neighbourhood social relations suggests that lockdown increased depressive symptoms by 21% for people with average perceived neighbourhood relations, compared with a 9.7% increase for people whose perceived relations is one standard deviation greater than average.

conclusionThe results add to evidence of the harsh impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdowns on mental health. Importantly, neighbourhood social relations and social cohesion more broadly may be an important source of social support in response to lockdowns. These findings provide important insights for researchers and policy-makers in how to understand and respond to the mental health impacts of COVID-19.

Indexed as

COVID-19AustraliaCommunicable Disease ControlHumansMental HealthPandemicsCOVID-19LockdownMental healthNatural experimentNeighbourhood social relationsSocial cohesion

Identifiers

PMID35219050
PMCPMC8847081
OpenAlexW4213226825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.