Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35218578›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2022

Patterns of germline and somatic testing after universal tumor screening for Lynch syndrome: A clinical practice survey of active members of the Collaborative Group of the Americas on Inherited Gastrointestinal Cancer.

Rachel Hodan, Linda Rodgers-Fouche, Sanjeevani Arora, Mev Dominguez-Valentin, Priyanka Kanth, Bryson W Katona, Kathryn A Mraz, Maegan E Roberts, Eduardo Vilar, Cynthia M Soto-Azghani and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 12 institutions in 3 countries.

Rachel HodanCancer Genetics, Stanford Health Care, Palo Alto, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2887-4079
Linda Rodgers-FoucheCenter for Cancer Risk Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3956-5821
Sanjeevani AroraCancer Prevention and Control Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8273-589X
Mev Dominguez-ValentinDepartment of Tumor Biology, Institute of Cancer Research, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-7856-0057
Priyanka KanthDivision of Gastroenterology, University of Utah Health and Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9303-1516
Bryson W KatonaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8186-9119
Kathryn A MrazCenter for Genomic Interpretation, Sandy, Utah, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9824-8159
Maegan E RobertsGeneDx, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0292-2557
Eduardo VilarDepartment of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6404-3761
Cynthia M Soto-AzghaniIndependent - Clinical Research Nurse, Tyler, Texas, USA.
Randall E BrandGastrointestinal Malignancy Early Detection, Diagnosis and Prevention Program, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Edward D EsplinInvitae, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9205-3756
Kimberly PerezDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/ Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5745-2994
Fox Chase Cancer Center · USGeneticaLens (United States) · USHarvard University · USInvitae (United States) · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USNorwegian Cancer Society · NOThe University of Texas at Tyler · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of Utah · USVA Palo Alto Health Care System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical guidelines recommend universal tumor screening (UTS) of colorectal and endometrial cancers for Lynch syndrome (LS). There are limited guidelines for how to integrate germline testing and somatic tumor testing after a mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) tumor is identified. We sought to characterize current practice patterns and barriers to preferred practice among clinical providers in high-risk cancer programs. A clinical practice survey was sent to 423 active members of the Collaborative Group of the Americas on Inherited Gastrointestinal Cancer (CGA-IGC) with a follow-up survey sent to 103 clinician responders. The survey outlined clinical vignettes and asked respondents their preferred next test. The survey intended to assess: (1) the role of patient age and family history in risk assessment and (2) barriers to preferred genetic testing. Genetic test options included targeted germline testing based on dMMR expression, germline testing for LS, germline testing with a multigene cancer panel including LS, or paired tumor/germline testing including LS. In October 2020, 117 of 423 (28%) members completed the initial survey including 103 (88%) currently active clinicians. In April 2021, a follow-up survey was sent to active clinicians, with 45 (44%) completing this second survey. After selecting their preferred next germline or paired tumor/germline tumor test based on the clinical vignette, 39% of respondents reported wanting to make a different choice for the initial genetic test without any testing barriers. The proportion of respondents choosing a different initial genetic test was dependent on the proband's age at diagnosis and specified family history. The reported barriers included patient's lack of insurance coverage, patient unable/unwilling to self-pay for proposed testing, and inadequate tumor tissue. Responders reported insurance, financial constraints, and limited tumor tissue as influencing preferred genetic testing in high-risk clinics, thus resulting in possible under-diagnosis of LS and impacting potential surveillance and cascade testing of at-risk relatives.

Indexed as

Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisEndometrial NeoplasmsGastrointestinal NeoplasmsAmericasEarly Detection of CancerFemaleGenetic TestingGerm CellsHumansImmunohistochemistrySurveys and Questionnairesclinical practice barriersgenetic counselinggenetic testingLynch syndromerisk assessmentuniversal tumor screening

Identifiers

PMID35218578
PMCPMC9544955
OpenAlexW4214720051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.