Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35218502›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2022

The New Role of Telehealth in Contemporary Medicine.

Morgan H Randall, David E Winchester

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Morgan H RandallDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
David E WinchesterDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Malcolm Randall VA Medical Center, 1600 SW Archer Rd 111-D, Gainesville, FL, 32608, USA. David.Winchester@va.gov.ORCID 0000-0002-5224-2891

Funding

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs HSR&D CDA-2 #13-023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewUnderstand the current uses for telehealth as well as future directions as it relates to the COVID-19 pandemic and cardiovascular medicine. RECENT

findingsTelehealth interventions in various forms have proven to be efficacious in the management of obesity, hypertension, glycemic control in diabetes, hyperlipidemia, medication adherence, and ICU length of stay and mortality. The use and study of such interventions have been greatly expanded during the pandemic partly due to the expanded coverage by payers. However, heterogenous interventions and a relative lack of cost analyses are barriers to more widespread adoption. Telehealth has proven efficacy for modifying risk factors for cardiovascular disease. To date, this has not been shown to translate to a reduction in hard cardiovascular endpoints such as mortality. With ongoing research and expanded funding, the role of telehealth is likely to evolve as the COVID pandemic continues.

Indexed as

COVID-19TelemedicineHumansMedication AdherencePandemicsSARS-CoV-2CardiologyCOVID-19TelehealthTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID35218502
PMCPMC8881748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.