Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35218456›Full record

ArticlePrimates; journal of primatology2022

Forest maturity has a stronger influence on the prevalence of spider monkeys than howler monkeys in an anthropogenically impacted rainforest landscape.

A Shedden, J C Dunn, R Martínez-Mota, J Cristóbal-Azkárate, P K Gillingham, C MacSwiney-González, A C Newton, E Rodríguez-Luna, A H Korstjens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Primates; journal of primatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

A SheddenFaculty of Science and Technology, Bournemouth University, Talbot Campus, Fern Barrow, Poole, BH12 5BB, Dorset, UK. ashedden@bournemouth.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1804-9043
J C DunnBehavioural Ecology Group, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge Campus, East Road, Cambridge, CB1 1PT, UK.
R Martínez-MotaCentro de Investigaciones Tropicales, José María Morelos #44, Zona Centro, C.P. 91000, Xalapa, Veracruz, México.
J Cristóbal-AzkárateDepartment of Basic Psychological Processes and Their Development, University of the Basque Country, 20018, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain.
P K GillinghamFaculty of Science and Technology, Bournemouth University, Talbot Campus, Fern Barrow, Poole, BH12 5BB, Dorset, UK.
C MacSwiney-GonzálezCentro de Investigaciones Tropicales, José María Morelos #44, Zona Centro, C.P. 91000, Xalapa, Veracruz, México.
A C NewtonFaculty of Science and Technology, Bournemouth University, Talbot Campus, Fern Barrow, Poole, BH12 5BB, Dorset, UK.
E Rodríguez-LunaCentro de Investigaciones Tropicales, José María Morelos #44, Zona Centro, C.P. 91000, Xalapa, Veracruz, México.
A H KorstjensFaculty of Science and Technology, Bournemouth University, Talbot Campus, Fern Barrow, Poole, BH12 5BB, Dorset, UK.

Funding

CONACyT 108990CONACyT 195409
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The transformation and depletion of primary forest over the past few decades have placed almost half of the world's primate species under the threat of extinction. Developing any successful conservation program for primates requires distribution and demography data, as well as an understanding of the relationships between these factors and their habitat. Between March and June 2010 and 2011 we collected data on the presence and demographic parameters of howler and spider monkeys by carrying out surveys, and validated our findings using local knowledge. We then examined the relationship between forest type and the presence of these primates at 54 sites in the northern area of the Selva Zoque Corridor, Mexico. We detected 86 spider monkey groups across 31 plots and censused 391 individuals (mean ± SD = 5.9 ± 3.0 individuals per sub-group, n = 67 sub-groups). We also detected 69 howler monkey groups across 30 plots and censused 117 individuals (mean ± SD = 5.3 ± 2.4 individuals per group, n = 22 groups). Howler monkey presence was not related to any specific vegetation type, while spider monkeys were present in areas with a higher percentage of tall forest (trees > 25 m high). Overall, spider monkeys were more prevalent than howler monkeys in our sampling sites and showed demographic characteristics similar to those in better protected areas, suggesting that the landscape features in the Uxpanapa Valley are suitable for their needs. Conversely, howler monkey presence was found to be more limited than in other regions, possibly due to the extended presence of spider monkeys.

Indexed as

AlouattaAtelinaeAnimalsForestsPrevalenceRainforestAlouattaAtelesEndangered primatesHabitat lossPrimate conservation

Identifiers

PMID35218456
PMCPMC9061665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.