Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35218441›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2022

Documenting fishes in an inland sea with citizen scientist diver surveys: using taxonomic expertise to inform the observation potential of fish species.

Elizabeth A Ashley, Christy V Pattengill-Semmens, James W Orr, Janna D Nichols, Joseph K Gaydos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elizabeth A AshleyKaren C. Drayer Wildlife Health Center - Orcas Island Office, SeaDoc Society, 942 Deer Harbor Rd, Eastsound, WA, 98245, USA. lashley@ucdavis.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3251-9221
Christy V Pattengill-SemmensReef Environmental Education Foundation (REEF), Key Largo, PO Box 370246, FL, 33037, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5255-6033
James W OrrSchool of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6631-9087
Janna D NicholsReef Environmental Education Foundation (REEF), Key Largo, PO Box 370246, FL, 33037, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6421-2796
Joseph K GaydosKaren C. Drayer Wildlife Health Center - Orcas Island Office, SeaDoc Society, 942 Deer Harbor Rd, Eastsound, WA, 98245, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6599-8797

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long-term monitoring enables scientists and managers to track changes in the temporal and spatial distributions of fishes. Given the anthropogenic stressors affecting marine ecosystem health, there is a critical need for robust, comprehensive fish monitoring programs. Citizen science can serve as a meaningful, cost-effective strategy to survey fish communities. We compared data from 13,000 surveys collected over 21 years (1998-2019) by Reef Environmental Education Foundation (REEF) volunteer divers to a published compilation of Salish Sea ichthyofauna collected using an assortment of methods. Volunteer divers observed 138 of 261 recognized species in the Salish Sea, expanded the range of 18 species into additional Salish Sea sub-basins, and identified one species novel to the Salish Sea (Gibbonsia metzi - Striped Kelpfish). To identify Salish Sea fish species that are most suitable to be monitored by underwater visual census and to evaluate confidence in in situ identification, we developed a categorization system based on the likelihood of recreational divers and snorkelers encountering a given species, and on whether identification required a specimen in hand or could be classified to species visually (with or without a high-quality photograph). REEF divers encountered 62% (138 of 223) of the visually detectable species occurring in the region and 85% (102 of 120) of species most likely to be observed by recreational divers. Our findings show that citizen scientists provide valuable monitoring data for over half of the 261 marine and anadromous fish species known to occupy the Salish Sea, many of which are not routinely monitored otherwise.

Indexed as

EcosystemEnvironmental MonitoringAnimalsFishesHumansVolunteersCitizen scienceFish distributionIchthyofaunaREEF Volunteer Fish Survey ProjectRoving diver techniqueSalish Sea

Identifiers

PMID35218441
PMCPMC8882091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.