Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35218421›Full record

ArticleHealth economics review2022

Cost-effectiveness of a photopethysmographic procedure for screening for atrial fibrillation in 6 European countries.

Steffen Wahler, Ralf Birkemeyer, Dimitrios Alexopoulos, Zbigniew Siudak, Alfred Müller, Johann-Matthias von der Schulenburg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health economics review, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Cost-effectiveness of atrial fibrillation screening programmes across European nations.European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Steffen WahlerSt. Bernward GmbH, Friedrich-Kirsten-Straße 40, D-22391, Hamburg, Germany. steffen.wahler@t-online.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4833-7449
Ralf BirkemeyerHerzklinik Ulm, Magirusstraße 40, D-89077, Ulm, Germany.
Dimitrios AlexopoulosAttikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Tetrapoleos 18, GR-115 27, Athens, Greece.
Zbigniew SiudakDepartment of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Jan Kochanowski University, Stefana Żeromskiego 5, PL-25-369, Kielce, Poland.
Alfred MüllerAnalytic Services GmbH, Jahnstr. 34c, D-80469, Munich, Germany.
Johann-Matthias von der SchulenburgUniversität Hannover, Welfengarten 1, D-30167, Hannover, Germany.

Funding

Preventicus Inc 5000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStrokes cause an estimated annual health care burden of 170 billion euros across Europe. Atrial fibrillation is one of the major risk factors for stroke and increases the individual risk 4.2-fold. But prevention with anticoagulants may reduce this risk by 70%. Screening methods are employed to detect previously undetected atrial fibrillation. Screening studies in various European countries show a high degree of undetected atrial fibrillation. This study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of systematic screening with a smartphone application, named Preventicus Heartbeats. It is a hands-on screening tool for use on smartphone to diagnose AF with high sensitivity and specificity.

methodsA previously published model for calculating screening cost-effectiveness was extended to 6 European countries covering a wide range in terms of treatment costs and epidemiologic parameters.

resultsThe use of screening lowers the cost per case in countries with comparatively high levels of health care costs (Switzerland: -€75; UK: -€7). Moderate higher costs per case were observed in 4 countries (Greece: €6; Netherlands: €15). Low levels of health care costs result in less or no potential for further cost reduction (Poland: €20; Serbia: €33). In all countries considered, the model showed an increase in effectiveness measures both in the number of strokes avoided and the quality adjusted life years. The number of strokes avoided per 1000 participants ranged from 2.52 (Switzerland) to 4.44 (Poland). Quality-adjusted life-years per case gained from screening ranged from 0.0105 (Switzerland) to 0.0187 (Poland). The screening procedure dominated in two countries (Switzerland, UK). For the remaining countries, the incremental cost effectiveness ratio ranged from €489/QALY (Greece) to €2548/QALY (Serbia).

conclusionThe model results showed a strong dependence of the results on the country-specific costs for stroke treatment. The use of the investigated screening method is close to cost-neutral or cost-reducing in the Western European countries and Greece. In countries with low price levels, higher cost increases due to AF screening are to be expected. Lower costs of anticoagulation, which are expected due to the upcoming patent expiry of direct anticoagulants, have a positive effect on the cost result.

Indexed as

Atrial fibrillationCost-effectiveness analysisPrevention of strokeScreening

Identifiers

PMID35218421
PMCPMC8882287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.