Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35218374›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2022

Excellent clinical and radiological outcomes after both open flake refixation and autologous chondrocyte implantation following acute patella dislocation and concomitant flake fractures.

Yannick J Ehmann, Lea Zuche, Andreas Schmitt, Daniel P Berthold, Marco-Christopher Rupp, Lukas N Muench, Alexander Otto, Klaus Woertler, Andreas B Imhoff, Julian Mehl

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Outcomes of surgical fixation of osteochondral fracture: a systematic review.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yannick J EhmannDepartment of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Lea ZucheDepartment of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Andreas SchmittDepartment of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Daniel P BertholdDepartment of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Marco-Christopher RuppDepartment of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Lukas N MuenchDepartment of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Alexander OttoDepartment of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Klaus WoertlerDepartment of Radiology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Andreas B ImhoffDepartment of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. imhoff@tum.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5085-6446
Julian MehlDepartment of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Technical University of Munich · DEUniversity Hospital Augsburg · DEZNA Middelheim Hospital · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate clinical and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging results of patients undergoing patella stabilization with either open flake refixation (oFR) or autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) and concomitant soft tissue patella stabilization after sustaining primary, acute patella dislocation with confirmed chondral and/or osteochondral flake fractures. It was hypothesized that refixation will lead to better results than ACI at mid-term follow-up.

methodsA retrospective chart review was conducted to identify all patients undergoing oFR or ACI after sustaining (osteo-)chondral flake fractures and concomitant soft tissue patella stabilization following primary, acute patella dislocation between 01/2012 and 09/2018 at the author's institution. Patients were excluded if they were aged < 14 years or > 30 and had previous knee surgeries at the index knee. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Tegner activity score, Kujala score, subjective IKDC score, and the KOOS score at a minimum follow-up of 24 months postoperatively. MR images were assessed using the Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) 2.0 knee score. Thirty patients were included in the study, with 16 patients assorted to the oFR group and 14 patients to the ACI group (Follow-up 81%).

resultsDemographic data did not show significant group differences (oFR: 6 females, 10 males; age 26.9 ± 5.6 years, FU: 57 months (27-97 months); ACI: 9 females, 5 males; age 25.5 ± 4.9 years, FU: 51 months (29-91 months); n.s.). Defect location was similar in both groups (oFR: 12 × patella/4 × lateral femoral condyle; ACI: 12/2; n.s.). Both groups showed excellent clinical outcomes, with no statistically significant difference between both the groups (oFR group vs. ACI group: Tegner: 5.1 ± 1.8 vs. 5.1 ± 1.4; Kujala: 86.1 ± 12.6 vs. 84.9 ± 9.1; IKDC: 83.8 ± 15.0 vs. 83.6 ± 11.3; KOOS: 83.3 ± 14.0 vs. 83.6 ± 12.0; n.s.). One patient in each group suffered a patella re-dislocation and needed revision surgery. The MOCART 2.0 score showed good results for the oFR group (68.2 ± 11.1) and the ACI group (61.1 ± 16.9) while no significant differences were noted between both the groups. The inter-rater reliability was excellent (0.847).

conclusionOpen refixation of (osteo-)chondral fragments in patients after sustaining acute patella dislocation with (osteo)-chondral flake fractures led to good clinical and radiological results at a minimum follow of 24 months, showing that it is a good surgical option in the treatment algorithm. However, if open refixation is not possible, ACI may be an excellent fallback option in these younger patients with equally good clinical and radiological outcomes, but requiring a second minimally invasive surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Indexed as

Cartilage, ArticularFractures, BonePatellar DislocationChondrocytesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKnee JointMalePatellaReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesTransplantation, AutologousACIAutologous chondral implantationFlake fracturePatellofemoral instabilityRefixation

Identifiers

PMID35218374
PMCPMC9464151
OpenAlexW4214534453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.