Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35218371›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2022

Real-world survival outcomes of adding docetaxel or abiraterone in patients with high-volume metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer: historically controlled, propensity score matched comparison with androgen deprivation therapy.

Shintaro Narita, Takahiro Kimura, Shingo Hatakeyama, Kenichi Hata, Takafumi Yanagisawa, Shinya Maita, Shuji Chiba, Hiromi Sato, Soki Kashima, Atsushi Koizumi and 12 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Treatment trends in patients with de novo metastatic prostate cancer in the era of upfront combination therapy.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Shintaro NaritaDepartment of Urology, Akita University School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, 010-8543, Japan. naritashintaro@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2988-1860
Takahiro KimuraDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Shingo HatakeyamaDepartment of Urology, Hirosaki University School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Kenichi HataDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Takafumi YanagisawaDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Shinya MaitaDepartment of Urology, Iwate Prefectural Isawa Hospital, Mizusawa, Japan.
Shuji ChibaDepartment of Urology, Yuri Kumiai General Hospital, Honjo, Japan.
Hiromi SatoDepartment of Urology, Akita University School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, 010-8543, Japan.
Soki KashimaDepartment of Urology, Akita University School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, 010-8543, Japan.
Atsushi KoizumiDepartment of Urology, Akita University School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, 010-8543, Japan.
Ryohei YamamotoDepartment of Urology, Akita University School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, 010-8543, Japan.
Koichiro TakayamaDepartment of Urology, Yokote City Hospital, Yokote, Japan.
Katsumi OkaneDepartment of Urology, Akita Kosei Medical Center, Akita, Japan.
Toshiya IshidaDepartment of Urology, Akita City Hospital, Akita, Japan.
Yohei HorikawaDepartment of Urology, Akita Red Cross Hospital, Akita, Japan.
Teruaki KumazawaDepartment of Urology, Omagari Kosei Medical Center, Daisen, Japan.
Jiro ShimodaDepartment of Urology, Iwate Prefectural Isawa Hospital, Mizusawa, Japan.
Takehiro SuzukiDepartment of Urology, Hiraka General Hospital, Yokote, Japan.
Chikara OhyamaDepartment of Urology, Hirosaki University School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Shin EgawaDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kyoko NomuraDepartment of Public Health, Akita University School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.
Tomonori HabuchiDepartment of Urology, Akita University School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, 010-8543, Japan.
Akita University · JPJikei University School of Medicine · JPHirosaki University · JPIwate Prefectural Central Hospital · JPAkita Red Cross Hospital · JPAkita University Hospital · JPHiraka General Hospital · JPMisasa Onsen Hospital · JPYokosuka Kyosai Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study investigated the impact of treatment intensification with upfront docetaxel (DOC) or abiraterone (ABI) plus prednisolone on survival outcomes in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) by comparing it with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) monotherapy or combined androgen blockade (CAB) using propensity score matching (PSM).

methodsOutcomes from 278 CHAARTED high-volume patients receiving upfront DOC (92 patients) or upfront ABI (186 patients) were compared to those from 354 patients receiving ADT or CAB. PSM was conducted to assess castration-resistant prostate cancer-free survival (CRPCFS) and overall survival (OS).

resultsAfter PSM, patient distributions between the three groups were well balanced. After 1:1 PSM, patients receiving upfront ABI had significantly better CRPCFS than those receiving ADT/CAB or upfront DOC [hazard ratio (HR) 0.39; 95% CI 0.27-0.56 vs. HR 0.50; 95% CI 0.30-0.82, respectively]. No significant difference in CRPCFS was observed between the upfront DOC and ADT/CAB groups (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.50-1.12). Patients receiving upfront DOC and upfront ABI had significantly better OS than those receiving ADT/CAB (HR 0.54; 95% CI 0.0.30-0.98 vs. HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.29-0.84, respectively). However, no significant difference in OS was observed between upfront ABI and upfront DOC (hazard ratio 0.84; 95% CI 0.34-2.06).

conclusionThe comparison of real-world retrospective cohorts showed that treatment intensification with upfront DOC or upfront ABI promoted better OS compared to ADT alone or CAB in patients with high-volume mCSPC after PSM. However, no difference in OS was observed between upfront DOC and upfront ABI.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsProstatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantAndrogen AntagonistsAndrogensAndrostenesAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCastrationDocetaxelHumansMalePropensity ScoreRetrospective StudiesabirateroneAndrogen AntagonistsAndrogensAndrostenesDocetaxelCastration sensitiveIntensified treatmentMetastaticProstate cancerSurvivalUpfront

Identifiers

PMID35218371
OpenAlexW4214737091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.